As a long-time shareholder of SABMiller (OTCPK:SBMRY), I really can't complain - the shares may have lagged Carlsberg (OTCPK:CABGY), Heineken (OTCQX:HEINY), Molson Coors (TAP), and Anheuser Busch InBev (BUD)
over the past 12 months, but over the last five and 10 years, they've
blown away the field (and it's not really even close). Looking ahead,
I'm admittedly concerned by the take-no-prisoners valuation, but also
encouraged by the company's leverage to growing, under-penetrated
emerging markets, strong asset and cash flow leverage, and potential for
further accretive acquisitions.
Continue here:
SABMiller Pretty Foamy, But With Great Emerging Market Leverage
Showing posts with label Anadolu Efes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anadolu Efes. Show all posts
Friday, May 23, 2014
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Seeking Alpha: Does SABMiller Taste Great, Or Is The Valuation Too Filling?
This has been a good year to own companies in the adult beverage trade, as stocks like Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD), Diageo (DEO), Pernod-Ricard (PDRDY.PK), and Heineken (HINKY.PK) have all outperformed the S&P 500 by a significant margin. The world's second-largest brewer, SABMiller (SBMRY.PK)
belongs on that list of outperformers as well, as investors have bid up
the shares on improving volume growth and margins. Looking out into
2013, though, the question is whether SABMiller is still poised to be an
outperformer.
Please read more here:
Does SABMiller Taste Great, Or Is The Valuation Too Filling?
Please read more here:
Does SABMiller Taste Great, Or Is The Valuation Too Filling?
Sunday, January 23, 2011
The Curious Case Of Brazil And Turkey
I do not spend all that much time talking about economics, monetary policy, and the like, but I am making an exception to talk about an interesting “compare and contrast” situation in the emerging markets. Specifically, I find it very interesting to see the unusual monetary policy being pursued by Turkey vis a vis other large emerging economies like Brazil.
High Growth, Lower Rates
Turkey is currently enjoying some of the best growth in Europe, coming in at about 8% for 2010. In most cases, that sort of growth would have policymakers nervous about inflation and looking to hike rates to cool things off. After all, that's what's going on in countries like Poland, Hungary, China, and Brazil right now.
Turkey is handling things quite a bit differently though, and lowering rates. Last week, Turkey's central bank cut rates by 25bp (to 6.25%) after cutting them 50bp back in December. At the same time, the country is raising banks' reserve requirements.
The idea here, then, is to deter yield-shoppers and limit the inflow of speculative/investment capital. Unfortunately, world markets do not usually react well to the unorthodox or the unexpected, and Turkey's actions are both – Turkey's central bank has been pretty cagey and this last rate move took the market by surprise. Moreover, a lot of economists and commentators believe that Turkey will botch this delicate balancing act and that the tougher reserve requirements won't offset the stimulation of lower rates and that this will this ramp up credit growth and stoke inflation.
What might be helping embolden Turkey's officials is the fact that inflation is very low by Turkish standards – about 6.4% in December. On the flip side, the ballooning current account deficit is a real concern, standing as it does at over 7.5% for the last period I could find data. Given that higher rates do not always produce their desired consequences, it is a credible (if very unorthodox) approach for Turkey to try.
That said, this unorthodox policy is certainly not helping Turkey's financial sector and major banks like Garanti (Nasdaq: TKGBY), Akbank (Nasdaq: AKBTY), and Yapi. All of those stocks have taken a smacking lately, as has the stock of Turkcell (NYSE: TKC). If Turkey's central bank is ultimately proven right, this could be a great buying opportunity in one of my favorite markets. If this “low rate in the face of high growth” policy backfires, though, it could take years to sort out the damage.
Brazil Going The Conventional Route
While Turkey is trying something new, Brazil is sticking to the old pattern. Brazil recently bumped its interest rate up 50bp to 11.25%, due in no small part to concerns about inflation. While Turkey has had bouts of high inflation before, it doesn't have the same history of some truly rampant hyper-inflation periods like Brazil does. Consequently, it is hard for me to imagine Brazil's central bank ever being cavalier about the risks of inflation. Unlike Turkey, Brazil also has much less to worry about in terms of its current account balance and the impact of capital inflows.
Not surprisingly, though, this round of tightening hasn't been great news for Brazilian bank stocks like Itau (Nasdaq: ITAU) or Banco Bradesco (NYSE: BBD). On the other hand, it has made virtually no difference for major exporters like Embraer (NYSE: ERJ) and Vale (Nasdaq: VALE). And then you have the broader market ETFs like the iShares Brazil Index (NYSE: EWZ) and Market Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (NYSE: BRF) – with a mix of exporters and more domestically-oriented stocks, these have traded lower, but not to the same extent as the financials.
It will be interesting to see how these two countries' policies play out. Clearly there are very different circumstances for each economy – Brazil is highly leveraged to China's development and appetite for raw materials, while Turkey is keenly exposed to Europe's health and demand for lower-cost manufactured imports. Nevertheless, Brazil runs the risk of choking off growth at time when it really needs to be using the windfall of commodity exports to develop a more balanced and sustainable economy. On the other hand, Turkey is not endangering its growth, but may well be risking its future stability.
The Bottom Line
I do not want to sound too cavalier about things, but on some level I dismiss monetary movements as “rates go up, rates go down … and the markets march on”. It's not wise to ignore a country's economic conditions or present fiscal/monetary policies, but you also cannot lose the forest for the trees. Should investors buy Brazilian financial stocks in the face of higher rates or Turkey financials in the face of market disapproval and uncertainty? Maybe not. By the same token, long-term value investors know that stocks often turn before the news changes and these stocks will probably stabilize and start rebounding ahead of any official “all clear” in interest rates.
More to the point, Turkey and Brazil are two places I really want to be for the long haul.
So, how cute should an investor be? After all, banks like Itau, Garanti, and Yapi are now trading at pretty attractive valuations. Sure, there is the risk that the stocks could go down another 10-20% with investor worries about monetary policies. But tell me when, exactly, there isn't *some* risk that could push down the price of an emerging market stock by a similar amount.
All things considered, I'd probably rather own exporters, but that's not always so easily done. The most liquid stocks (and those most likely to trade as ADRs) are usually domestic-focused companies like banks, utilities, and telecoms. It's a little easier with Brazil, with stocks like Embraer, Brazil Foods (Nasdaq: BRFS), and Vale, but there are fewer options with Turkey beyond ETFs, index funds, mutual funds, and a few stocks like Anadolu Efes.
The bottom line, then, is that I'd be looking to start buying. Maybe world markets are at a near-term top and maybe we're all due for a pullback. That's just part of the risk of investing. Given the turbulence and concerns over monetary policy, though, I'd probably take a multi-stage approach – looking to buy maybe one-third of my position in the next few weeks, another third a few weeks later, and the final third in a few months.
What should investors buy? I would take a very serious look at the three banks – Akbank, Garanti, and Yapi (the first two are reasonably liquid ADRs). I would also dig deeper and look into names like Anadolu, Tofas, Koc Holdings and so on. In fact, I hope to be back in a week or so with some additional Turkish names, hopefully with available ADRs. For Brazil, I'm talking my book, but I'd seriously consider Brazil Foods, as well perhaps as Cosan (NYSE: CZZ), Vale, Itau, Petrobras (NYSE: PBR), and Hypermarcas.
Disclosure: I own shares of Turkcell and Brazil Foods
Labels:
Akbank,
Anadolu Efes,
Banco Bradesco,
Brazil,
Brazil Foods,
Cosan,
Embraer,
Garanti,
Hypermarcas,
Itau,
KOC Holdings,
monetary policy,
Petrobras,
Tofas,
Turkcell,
Turkey,
Vale,
Yapi Kredi
Friday, December 3, 2010
A Melancholy "Do Svidaniya" To Wimm-Bill-Dann
It is always something of a shame when a good company gets bought out and goes away, and even more so when the company is a relatively rare play on a market. Wimm-Bill-Dann (NYSE: WBD) is one of the relatively few Russian companies with liquid ADR shares in the United States, and it's an even scarcer consumer goods company. Now, with Pepsico's (NYSE: PEP) proposed buyout of the company, shareholders get a nice parting gift, but international investors are left a bit poorer for choice.
Terms Of The Deal
Under the deal announced Thursday, Pepsico will pay $3.8 billion (or $33 per ADR) for a 66% stake in Wimm-Bill-Dann. As a condition of Russian law, Pepsico will then be required to make a buyout offer at the same price to minority shareholders. I frankly admit that I am not an expert in Russian M&A law, so I do not know what happens if the minority shareholders elect to refuse the deal. But I imagine that Pepsico would, at a minimum, cancel the ADR program even if it cannot complete a deal for 100% of the shares. (For more, see ADR Basics: Introduction.)
To read the full piece, please go to:
http://stocks.investopedia. com/stock-analysis/2010/A- Melancholy-Do-Svidaniya-To- Wimm-Bill-Dann-PEP-WBD-DANOY- KO-CEDC-NSRGY-CIADF1202.aspx
Terms Of The Deal
Under the deal announced Thursday, Pepsico will pay $3.8 billion (or $33 per ADR) for a 66% stake in Wimm-Bill-Dann. As a condition of Russian law, Pepsico will then be required to make a buyout offer at the same price to minority shareholders. I frankly admit that I am not an expert in Russian M&A law, so I do not know what happens if the minority shareholders elect to refuse the deal. But I imagine that Pepsico would, at a minimum, cancel the ADR program even if it cannot complete a deal for 100% of the shares. (For more, see ADR Basics: Introduction.)
To read the full piece, please go to:
http://stocks.investopedia.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)