Showing posts with label IC Potash. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IC Potash. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Investopedia: Keep An Eye On This Titan

No one knows when the next run in agriculture is going to start, or if the last one is truly over yet. After all, some of the high crop prices last year were certainly due to a spate of bad harvests, and favorable weather could deliver a bumper crop this year. Then again, a large amount of the U.S. corn crop is going to ethanol, food demand is ever-growing and natural disasters are a "where" not "if" question. 


When agriculture runs, investors turn to fertilizer stocks like Potash (NYSE:POT), equipment companies like Deere (NYSE:DE), seed companies like Syngenta (NYSE:SYT), and ETFs like PowerShares Agriculture (NYSE:DBA) and MarketVectors Agribusiness (NYSE:MOO).

Perhaps investors should add Titan Machinery (Nasdaq:TITN), the leading dealer of CNH Global's (NYSE:CNH) Case and New Holland agriculture and construction equipment, to their watch lists. Not only is this a viable play on agriculture equipment demand, but it gives investors exposure to a recovery in construction equipment demand (whenever that may happen). 



To read the full piece, please go here:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/Keep-An-Eye-On-This-Titan-TITN-DE-CNH-CAT-AGCO-DBA-MOO0420.aspx

Friday, January 28, 2011

Investopedia: Caterpillar Still Down A Cylinder Or Two

The "stuff trade" may be about a year and a half old now, but Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) is still making money hand over fist as a major supplier of machinery. What's more, while construction may still be flat on its back in the U.S., a lot of the developing world continues to build at a truly dizzying pace. History says this too will fade, but Caterpillar may yet have a few more quarters in the sunshine.


The Quarter That Was 
Sales jumped 62% in the December quarter, as the company saw a 69% increase in sales in its machinery and engine segment. Breaking that down even further, machinery sales were up 88%, while engine revenue increased 36%. Volume growth was a significant part of growth in both business, with higher value added almost $4 billion to the machinery total.

While sales growth was strong, the rest of the income statement was a bit more questionable. The company booked a solid improvement in gross margin, but operating margin was less impressive. True, the company did see its operating margin increase more than 750 basis points from last year's level, but the pace of margin improvement seemed less impressive in light of the volume gains. In other words, the company's incremental operating margins were somewhat disappointing. Moreover, while the company did report an impressive bottom line earnings beat, a big chunk of that came from a lower tax rate. (For more, see Analyzing Operating Margins.

The Road Ahead 
With a backlog of nearly $19 billion (double the mid-2009 levels), Caterpillar still has plenty of promising business prospects going into 2011. Mining companies like Vale (Nasdaq: VALE), Potash (NYSE:POT) and Rio Tinto (NYSE:RIO) continue to expand operations and open new mining sites, and that requires machinery. Moreover, do not forget that companies like Gafisa (NYSE:GFA), Vanke, and China Railway continue to build residential and commercial projects at a rapid pace in markets like Brazil and China.


Click the link below for the full article:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/Caterpillar-Still-Down-A-Cylinder-Or-Two-CAT-VALE-RIO-GFA-POT-DE-JOYG0128.aspx

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Mosaic, Jackson Pollock-Style


As readers probably have seen by now, the very private Cargill and Mosaic (NYSE: MOS) are engaging a transaction whereby Cargill will basically divest its sizable holdings (64% of outstanding shares) in Mosaic over three years.

Given the presumption that Cargill would have happily sold Mosaic for the right price, a lot of people seem to be reading this deal as a sign that a willing buyer did not emerge (or would not / could not meet Cargill's particular needs). Unfortunately for Mosaic shareholders, the details of this transaction will make a deal quite a bit harder while it is in progress, so it may effectively mean that Mosaic is off the market until the deal is largely done.

All of that, in turn, led to a 10.5% drop in the stock in Wednesday's trading.

Cargill Shuffles Its Deck
From where I sit, this seems to largely be about Cargill wanting to alter its structure and give some shareholders a liquidity event without doing anything to jeopardize the intense privacy and closely-held structure with which Cargill conducts its affairs. In practice, Cargill will be exchanging 179 million of its 286 million Mosaic shares for Cargill stock held by various parties, including charitable trusts tied to the late Margaret Cargill. A further 107 million Mosaic shares will go in exchange for Cargill debt.

Unfortunately, there's more. As part of this deal, Mosaic will recapitalize into three classes of stock – common, Class A, and Class B. Class B stock will have special voting rights (10 votes per share), and neither the “A” or “B” will be publicly traded. All existing Mosaic shareholders who are not Cargill will just common stock on a one-for-one basis; Cargill's shares will be divvied up as 115M shares of “common”, 60M of “A”, and 111M of “B”. After the split, then, parties currently holding Cargill stock will control 81% of the votes and, thus, the board of directors.

There's still more... Mosaic will have a registered share offering 15 months later to sell 157M shares. The other 129M shares will be locked up for two and a half years and then sold off in three installments after that two and a half year waiting period, with Mosaic helping to register the shares and launch a secondary. So although this deal does not change the economic/accounting sharecount for Mosaic, the reality is that the public float will go much higher – to the tune of about 157 million shares in the next 15 months.

Along the way, Mosaic will also be constrained when it comes to share buybacks or special dividends.

Ugh, what a mess.

The bottom line here is that Cargill is doing what's best for Cargill – namely, letting some of its shareholders monetize their stakes without having to go public or let newcomers into the ownership of the company. For a very private (and in some respects, secretive) company, that's not a big surprise. This deal is not really a positive for Mosaic shareholders, but why would Cargill worry all that much about it? Mosaic is an asset that they control, and they will use it in whatever fashion that serves them best.

In the meantime, of course Mosaic management will praise and support this deal. After all, Cargill still owns and controls the company – if Mosaic management isn't willing to sing from the sheet music they provide, they'll find managers who will.

No Deal On The Way?
Will Mosaic get sold? Well, don't hold your breath. As I said earlier, I have to think that Cargill would have been happy to sell this asset for cash to Vale (Nasdaq: VALE), BHP Billiton (NYSE: BHP), Sinochem or any other well-heeled party. They probably would have also been willing (albeit less happy) to sell for a combination of cash and stock, since even mighty BHP would be hard-pressed to pay all cash for Mosaic.

That's not to say that it couldn't still happen. BHP would probably love to get its hands on a piece of Canpotex (a fertilizer distribution business jointly owned by Mosaic, Potash (NYSE: POT), and Agrium (NYSE: AGU)), but Mosaic wouldn't sell that cheaply (if at all).

All in all, though, Mosaic is more likely to be a buyer than a seller. Junior potash miners like Allana Mining, IC Potash, and Western Potash could come into play, though Mosaic has a lot of brownfield opportunities that would likely be more economical than an acquisition. But who knows – maybe Monsanto (NYSE: MON) decides that they want out of the fertilizer business and they sell it to Mosaic (or, conversely, maybe Monsanto buys one of those juniors to expand its fertilizer business …). Or maybe Mosaic thinks big and global and goes for Yara (Nasdaq: YARIY).

Clearly I'm just throwing ideas against the wall here in terms of wait Mosaic's plans might be.

But here's what I do know – Cargill is doing what's best for Cargill and Mosaic shareholders are getting hosed (or at least severely inconvenienced). After all, Mosaic shares are plenty liquid now and it's not like worries about Cargill's plans for the company have held the shares back too badly. With no compensation going to existing minority shareholders, I don't see how they are compensated for the inconveniences and complexities created in this deal.

While I wrote a little while ago on Mosaic and thought the stock was not cheap (but maybe still well-placed for momentum/secular players), now I'm not so sure. Who needs all of the headaches of this Cargill deal when there are so many other stocks out there?

I would AVOID Mosaic shares right now, but momentum/secular traders might still like it as an ag play

Disclosure: I own shares of Monsanto


Friday, January 14, 2011

Today Tunisia, Tomorrow Egypt?


High food prices have been getting a lot of attention lately, and they may have actually claimed a government. While it might be simplistic to tie the populist revolt in Tunisia (the president of 23 years has fled the country) to food, it certainly played a role. After all, the proximate cause of the protests that ultimately forced the president from power was the self-immolation of an unemployed college graduate upset that Tunisian police were blocking him from selling vegetables without a permit.

Now, Tunisia had plenty of other problems and it may well have been only a matter of time before “something” set off the powder keg. But that doesn't mean that there isn't a lot of potential trouble stirring because of food. The Indonesian president is encouraging citizens to grow their own chilli peppers, the Indian cabinet is supposedly having high-level meetings about the price of onions, and South Korea has released some emergency stores of cabbage, pork, fish, and vegetables according to the Financial Times.

Please Sir, I Want Some More”
Why all the fuss over food? After all, Americans spend only about 7% of their budget on food. Well, in Thailand percentage is 26%, in Nigeria the number is about 50%, and in Tanzania its 71%. Consequently, a 10% rise in food prices is an annoyance to Americans, but a crisis to a large percentage of the world's inhabitants.

Unfortunately, trouble is stirring. Bad weather has wreaked havoc on crops in countries as diverse as Australia, Russia, and Pakistan this year, and there may be many more countries that have problems (or problem areas) that just don't crack the international news. On top of that, crop yields in South America have been disappointing in many recent years, so even a high-producing area cannot always be relied upon.

That has translated into sky-high prices for corn, soybeans, and wheat, and rice is on the way up. That, in turn, is wreaking havoc in a lot of countries. China is resorting to odd ploys like allowing trucks carrying vegetables to avoid tolls in the hopes of getting more produce to city markets. Other countries face a tough choice – try to fight inflation with higher rates and risk killing economic growth, or let food prices rise even higher and threaten the stability of the country. Making matters worse, it's unclear whether raising interest rates will help fight food price inflation – food prices are high because there is too little of it and interest rates don't change people's basic daily nutrition needs or produce sacks of wheat.

No Crisis Goes Wasted...
Of course, some folks cannot let a good crisis go to waste. One of the sillier notions is that these higher food prices are a direct consequence of the Fed's latest round of quantitative easing.

Uh … right.

Okay, I'm willing to go along with the idea that QE in the U.S. has led to some global inflation. But I'll need one of these demagogues to explain to me how Bernanke's moves lead to bad weather in Russia or Australia. Likewise, I'll need to see a Glen Beck-style flowchart for me to understand how easy money in the U.S. is perpetuating the La Nina weather phenomenon or the volcanic activity in eastern Russia that is messing with global weather patterns.

If the weather stays bad (and I don't know anywhere near enough meteorological science to figure that one out), the food situation will get even worse. That could be potentially explosive news for the leadership in Egypt, Indonesia, India, Algeria, Pakistan, Venezuela, and a host of African countries. It could even cause trouble in relatively stable countries like Turkey or Indonesia – if people are starving (or facing serious budget problems because of food prices), it is a lot easier for radicals to capture hearts and minds, particularly if they promise to feed their new converts.

Simply put, a lot of countries are going to face the reality that food security and national security are one in the same at the margins.

Solutions In The Seeds?
Maybe this doesn't reach the level of a Malthusian nightmare, but this latest bout of food insecurity might just lead some countries to some very difficult decisions. In the United States we have the luxury of fretting about organic foods, shopping at Whole Foods (Nasdaq: WFMI), and manufacturing fears about the hybrid seeds sold by Monsanto (NYSE: MON), Syngenta (NYSE: SYT), and DuPont (NYSE: DD).

But can Egypt or Pakistan afford the same luxury? If Monsanto seeds can boost yields by 10%, you could argue there is a moral obligation to use them. Sure, there are plenty of other problems with agriculture in much of the developing world – depleted soils, inadequate roads and logistics, lack of access to credit and advanced farming techniques – but hybrid seeds offer at least one potential solution.

So, what does all of this mean for investors?

If you're playing the commodity markets, these are wild times. Likewise, a lot of food companies, particularly those leveraged to emerging economies, have gotten a lot of attention. Zhongpin (Nasdaq: HOGS) and Cresud (Nasdaq: CRESY) are near their highs, as are the stocks of companies that hold the promise of improving food production. Here I'm thinking of names like Potash (NYSE: POT), Yara (Nasdaq: YARIY), Deere (NYSE: DE), and the until-recently-under-performing Monsanto.

In point of fact, a lot of these stocks are already near their highs. That doesn't mean that they won't go higher, though. I would be a little careful about owning meat producers, as many are vulnerable to higher feed costs (corn and soybeans), but it looks like a good time to be in grains, seeds, fertilizer, and processing/storage.

Beyond the food stocks, investors may want to keep a cautious eye on certain parts of the emerging markets. For countries like Brazil, China, and Turkey, these higher food prices are likely just a massive headache for the respective governments and will complicate their efforts to balance growth, inflation, and domestic harmony. For countries like Pakistan and Egypt, though, the consequences could be quite a bit higher and investors may want to tread carefully with the stocks and bonds of these countries.

History says that weather and crop yields will bounce back. Eventually the weather will settle down, crop yields will soar, and people will talk again about record-low prices for corn and soybeans. I have no idea “when”, though, and high food prices (and the resulting chaos) could be in the news for a while longer, perhaps even years. In the meantime, this is just another factor for investors to digest and discount – there is clearly an opportunity to play food stocks, but there is also the potential political chaos in the emerging markets to consider, as well as lower-growth and political/economic fallout in many of the most attractive emerging markets. 

Disclosure - I own shares of Monsanto
(apologies for not realizing  for a couple of days that I had failed to include this disclaimer...)  

Monday, January 10, 2011

Investopedia: Mosaic's Opportunities Still Look Fertile

Mosaic (NYSE:MOS), one of the largest fertilizer companies in the world, has already enjoyed a solid run of late, as the shares have doubled from late June. But with crop prices still very high, fertilizer inventories running low and an industry operating at a high level of capacity utilization, it may not be too late to make money off of another bull cycle in crop nutrition. 

The Quarter That Was
Mosaic reported a fiscal second quarter performance that was comfortably ahead of analyst expectations. Revenue jumped 56% in the period, though the inner workings were a bit confusing. Phosphate sales jumped 49% on a 10% increase in shipments (in metric tons) and a better-than-60% spike in average realized prices. The potash segment delivered even better growth (up 69%), as shipments jumped 75% but average selling prices fell about 11%. On a gross profit basis, both units were much better - phosphate gross profits rose 321%, while potash was up 59% and overall company-wide gross profit rose 150%.

Looking Towards a Tighter Market
Mosaic's CEO was rather optimistic about the outlook for 2011, talking about a potentially "outstanding" year to come. There's plenty of reason to buy into that. Crops prices are still quite high, and high prices have the tendency to encourage more planting. Elsewhere, inventory stocks of fertilizers are rather low. Going a step further, it looks like the major producers [including Potash (NYSE:POT), BHP Billiton (NYSE:BHP), Agrium (NYSE:AGU), Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI), and Yara (Nasdaq:YARIY)] are going to be running somewhere in the high-eighties to low-nineties as a percent of capacity - a level of production that suggests that any missteps or outages could lead to a spike in prices. (For more, see 5 Agriculture Stocks To Grow With.)

All in all, then, it looks like a year where demand will be strong and supply will be tight. Given that Potash, Mosaic, Vale (Nasdaq:VALE) and BHP control a lot of the new brownfield expansion opportunities, it seems reasonable that they will not crush their own market by bringing on too much capacity too quickly. Moreover, junior potash companies like Allana Mining, IC Potash, and Western Potash are many years away from production and cannot influence current supply. 



Please click the link to continue:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/Mosaics-Opportunities-Still-Look-Fertile-MOS-POT-AGU-BHP-VALE-VARIY-DD0110.aspx