Showing posts with label St Jude. Show all posts
Showing posts with label St Jude. Show all posts

Friday, March 16, 2012

Investopedia: NVEC Still Searching For Commercial Relevance

One of the most frustrating experiences an investor can have is to be right about the technology, but wrong about the investment. NVE Corporation (Nasdaq:NVEC) has undeniably interesting technology, but questions remains as to whether this small company can fully develop spintronics-based products to penetrate potentially large markets like healthcare, wireless communications and industrial couplers. While there's still significant potential for greater adoption, investors have to at least consider the risk that NVEC will do all of the heavy lifting only to see others ultimately profit from the technology.

A String of Recent Frustrations  
NVEC has been on a relatively bad run of late with respect to its financial performance. Although the fact that only one sell-side analyst follows this company mitigates the significance of performance vis-a-vis estimates, it was still disappointing performance.

Please click here for more:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2012/NVEC-Still-Searching-For-Commercial-Relevance-NVEC-STJ-TXN-INTC-IBM0316.aspx

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Seeking Alpha: ZOLL Medical - One Of The Best Growth Stories Is Gone

Great growth stories in med-tech really are a "now you see it, now you don't" proposition, as large rivals either whittle away the growth with competition or buy the company outright. The latter proved to be the fate for ZOLL Medical (ZOLL) as this fast-growing med-tech company accepted an all-cash takeover bid.

The Deal
ZOLL Medical announced that it accepted an all-cash offer from Japan's Asahi Kasei for $2.21 billion, or $93 per share in cash. At this price, ZOLL shareholders get a 24% premium to Friday's close, more than 27 times trailing EBTIDA, and more than four times trailing revenue.

Read more here:
Zoll Medical: One Of The Best Growth Stories Is Gone

Friday, February 24, 2012

Seeking Alpha: Volcano Still Searching For The Sweet Spot

It's not often that you find a medical technology story where almost everybody agrees that product/technology in question improves outcomes and reduces costs over the long term, but few people want to use it anyway. That is, and has always been, the story with Volcano (VOLC) as this mid-cap imaging story tries to drive broader adoption of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) products in the U.S. and Europe.

Q4 Results Show Ongoing Share Growth
The immediate takeaway from the Volcano fourth quarter is that it was a disappointment; management previously announced that sales were going to come in short of expectations and I believe this marked the first such disappointment in its public history. Looking closer, though, there were actually a lot of positives to take from the quarter.

Read more here:
Volcano Still Searching For The Sweet Spot

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Seeking Alpha: Medtronic's Growth Problems Still Front And Center

Another quarter goes in the books and Medtronic (MDT) investors are still waiting to see some real signs of life when it comes to re-igniting top line growth. Although nobody questions Medtronic's ability to maintain leadership positions in many large med-tech markets, there are ample questions as to whether the company can translate this leadership into growth. Current conditions being what they are, investors have to put a lot more of their hopes on future product and market developments to make this stock look appealing today.

A Disappointing Fiscal Third Quarter
To be fair, Medtronic's "disappointment" relative to expectations was not that bad in an absolute sense. More problematic, though, is how it undermines the idea that 2012 conditions will get significantly better in some core markets.


Read more here:
Medtronic's Growth Problems Still Front And Center

Friday, January 27, 2012

Seeking Alpha: Covidien Plays To Its Strengths And Looks Undervalued

Sometimes healthcare is like real estate and success is all about location. For most of the past decade, Covidien's (COV) strengths were not seen as especially valuable - investors wanted the hot growth stories in stents, ICDs, and orthopedic implants, not a company that makes staplers and vessel sealers. Now, though, Covidien is the med-tech name that is showing good growth and the former winners are struggling to follow.

A Solid Start To The Fiscal Year
Covidien reported organic revenue growth of nearly 5% for the fiscal year; not only beating the analysts' guesses, but showing some acceleration from recent trends. The company reported 6% top-line growth from devices, about 4% growth in the pharmaceuticals division, and basically no growth in supplies. Relative to expectations, devices and drugs were surprisingly strong, while supplies were weak.

Please follow this link for the full article:
Covidien Plays To Its Strengths And Still Looks Undervalued

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Seeking Alpha: 5 High Quality Large Med-Tech Names You Can Buy Today

It hasn't been easy to make money in medical device stocks over the past year. Volume growth has been stymied by a job market where people have lost health insurance coverage or cannot afford to take time off to recuperate from major procedures. At the same time, Department of Justice audits have forced hospitals to reexamine their reimbursement and device usage policies. If that wasn't enough, those same hospitals are pushing back on the sort of annual price increases that medical device companies once considered automatic.

Against that sluggish backdrop all is not lost. Hospitals may have over-implanted cardiac rhythm devices like ICDs and orthopedic devices like artificial hips, but long-term demographics and quality of life expectations still favor these businesses. What's more, many companies have harvested the cash flow of their existing businesses to invest in long-range R&D projects that could open up large markets in the years to come.

Please follow this link for more:
5 High Quality Large Med-Tech Names You Can Buy Today

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Investopedia: 2011 - Another Sick Year For Larger Med-Tech

Healthcare may not have been in the emergency room, or even the ICU, during 2011, but this sector was sick from beginning to end. Unfortunately, the story that was true in 2010 is still true today - higher unemployment means fewer people with health insurance, and even those with coverage are more nervous about taking time off or meeting their copays. At the same time, hospitals and the federal government continue to draw hard lines on pricing, and there have been few innovative product launches to stimulate new markets.


Just to frame the discussion, the Dow Jones U.S. Medical Devices Index Fund (NYSE:IHI) has fallen more than 5% year-to-date as of this writing.

A Very Familiar Name on Top
Yet again, one name dominated the list of top-performing med-techs. Intuitive Surgical (Nasdaq:ISRG) is still really the only game in town when it comes to surgical robots, and demand for these devices has remained high despite a fairly conservative environment for hospital equipment. Intuitive has seen revenue rise nearly 30% over the trailing twelve months, while the stock has jumped nearly 70%. Trading at over 23 times EBITDA and nearly 10 times revenue, this is hardly an undiscovered bargain in the space, but it does offer the growth that institutional investors are so desperate to find. (For related reading, see A Primer On The Biotech Sector.)


To continue, please follow this link:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/2011---Another-Sick-Year-For-Larger-Med-Tech-ISRG-ABT-JNJ-BSX-MDT-STJ-SYK1228.aspx

Friday, November 25, 2011

Investopedia: Medtronic May Be A Heavyweight, But It Can Still Hit Hard


Watching Medtronic (NYSE: MDT) over the past decade has been an interesting case study. Medtronic used to be one of the great growth stories of the med-tech world and the valuation reflected it, even well past the point where growth could no longer keep up. Since then, Wall Street has over-corrected and Medtronic now seems underestimated and underappreciated. True, Medtronic will never return to its go-go growth days and there is something of a lumbering titan about this company, but what titans may lack in dexterity, they can often make up in staying power.

Fiscal Q2 - Little Expected and That's What Was Delivered 
Medtronic's fiscal second quarter wasn't great, but nobody expected that it would be. Revenue rose 6% as reported, with constant currency growth of 3% and organic growth in the vicinity of 1%. That's not impressive; more like Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), than Covidien (NYSE: COV) or St. Jude (NYSE: STJ).




Read the full article here:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/Medtronic-May-Be-A-Heavyweight-But-It-Can-Still-Hit-Hard-MDT-STJ-JNJ-BSX-ABT-EW-COV-NUVA1125.aspx

Monday, October 24, 2011

Investopedia: St. Jude Still A Patient Trade


Investors looking for good growth stories in big-cap med-tech, are not exactly spoiled for choice. Formerly reliable growers like Medtronic (NYSE:MDT), Stryker (NYSE:SYK) and Boston Scientific (NYSE:BSX), are still struggling to reignite growth and quality blue-chips, like Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ), are muddling through a low-volume environment.

Against that backdrop, St. Jude (NYSE:STJ) is not so disappointing. What's more, while this company does have several formidable competitors hard at work in taking away their business, St. Jude also has a compelling portfolio that could deliver growth re-acceleration in a few years.

Ho-Hum Third Quarter 
Expectations were not high for St. Jude, going into this quarter, and St. Jude did not deliver a lot of growth. Reported revenue rose more than 11%, but organic growth was sub-2%. The company's ICD business remains weak and neuromodulation is looking a little disappointing. Atrial fibrillation delivered 20% growth, though, and the cardiovascular business is getting a big boost from the AGA Medical acquisition.



Read more here:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/St.-Jude-Still-A-Patient-Trade-STJ-MDT-SYK-BSX-JNJ-EW-ABT1024.aspx

Friday, October 21, 2011

Seeking Alpha: Boston Scientific Is Not A Safe Turnaround Bet

Another quarter and another disappointment for Boston Scientific (BSX). With a new caretaker CEO at the reins, but only for a year, it an open question as to whether investors can reasonably expect any near-term progress. While there are some bright spots deep in the pipeline, it is going to take many years for them to bear fruit, and BSX will find itself having to battle for share amidst established competition. All in all, this is an investment that requires a great deal of faith - and hope and faith are seldom great partners to have in an investment.

Another Disappointing Quarter
Boston Scientific reported that sales declined 6% on a constant currency basis, with core revenue (that is, excluding divested lines) down 3%. The company's interventional cardiology segment (which includes drug-coated stents) saw revenue fall 4%, while the CRM business (which includes pacemakers and ICDs) fell 12%. Neuromodulation (up 6%) and peripheral intervention (up 4%) weren't bad, but endoscopy (up 6%) is about as close to good news as there was for the quarter. But that business contributes only about 16% of total revenue.


Read the full article here:
Boston Scientific Is Not A Safe Turnaround Bet

Thursday, August 4, 2011

Investopedia: The Perpetual Boston Scientific Turnaround Story

I've stopped trying to count just how long Boston Scientific (NYSE:BSX) has been a "turnaround" story in the med-tech space, because frankly it feels like waiting for Godot. This company paid a huge amount of money to enter two markets right before major slowdowns and no combination of acquisitions, restructurings or buzzwords has managed to deliver any sort of exciting consistent free cash flow growth. 

A Second Quarter Worse Than Mediocre  
This has not been a great second quarter across the medical device space, as economic issues have kept patients away from their doctors and hospitals have pushed back hard on price inflation. Even against a backdrop of challenging volumes at rivals like Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ), Bard (NYSE:BCR), Stryker (NYSE:SYK) and St. Jude (NYSE:STJ), Boston Scientific did not stand out positively. 


Read the full piece below:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/The-Perpetual-Boston-Scientific-Turnaround-Story-BSX-JNJ-MDT-STJ-ABT-COV-VOLC0804.aspx

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Seeking Alpha: How The Healthcare Sector Became Another Way To Play The Jobs Report

There used to be a time when healthcare was one of those all-weather “safe” plays. No matter the ups and downs of the economy, healthcare stocks never sank too far. As second quarter earnings are highlighting quite clearly, those days are clearly long past now. Healthcare investors need to hope for real improvement in job and wage statistics if the sector is to grow. Though there is still some leverage to be had in hospitals boosting their capital spending from the unsustainably low levels of 2008-2010, that play has its own expiration date.


Where Have All The Patients Gone?
Take a look at the earnings from companies like Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), Bard (NYSE: BCR), and St. Jude (NYSE: STJ) and problems pop out. None of these companies are seeing much real volume growth in their device businesses, as patients are staying home and out of doctors' offices and hospitals. Even at a company like Covidien (NYSE: COV), that is actually doing relatively well, the underlying organic growth is not terribly robust outside of taking share from other med-tech rivals.

To read the full piece at Seeking Alpha:
How the Healthcare Sector Became Another Way to Play the Jobs Report

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Investopedia: Drugs Don't Cure All That Ails J&J

Not liking Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) can sometimes feel tantamount to not liking apple pie or capitalism itself. True, JNJ is among the bluest of blue chips and a company with incredible staying power. And yet, the idea of investing in individual stocks is to outperform the broader markets, and JNJ is not necessarily the best option for that goal. (To help you pick stocks, check out How To Pick A Stock.)

Mediocre Q2 Results  
Johnson & Johnson did not report a bad second quarter result, but nor was it an exceptionally strong quarter. Revenue rose about 8% as reported, but organic growth was a much more modest 2%. Growth was led by the pharmaceutical group where sales were up more than 5% on an organic basis. Devices were less impressive at just over 1% growth, and the consumer business was down almost 2% on an organic basis. 


Read more:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/Drugs-Dont-Cure-All-That-Ails-JJ-JNJ-PFE-ABT-BSX-STJ-COV-MDT0720.aspx

Friday, May 27, 2011

Investopedia: Medtronic Still Muddling Through


These are challenging times for even the best medical technology companies. Insurance companies, hospitals and national governments are pushing back hard on pricing, patient visits are down, and innovation seems stifled between modest clinical progress and a considerably more conservative FDA. Not surprisingly, then, Medtronic (NYSE:MDT) is delivering much less growth than long-term investors are accustomed to, and the near-term outlook is not looking especially strong.

The real question, though, is whether Medtronic can pull out of this rut. Even just a bit more growth at the top line would make this stock a value, but stagnant markets and the turmoil of the transition to a new CEO could keep a lid on the shares in the near term.

A Weak End to the Fiscal Year
Analysts were not expecting a great fiscal fourth quarter, but Medtronic's results were weak nonetheless. Reported revenue was flat on a constant currency basis, though adjusting for the extra week in the year-ago quarter would have bumped the growth rate to 2%. As this quarter shows, foreign sales are becoming increasingly important to Medtronic's growth. Foreign sales were up 7% (constant currency) to just under $2 billion, with emerging market growth coming in at 20%.


For the full article, please click below:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/Medtronic-Still-Muddling-Through-MDT-STJ-NUVA-JNJ-ABT-OFIX0526.aspx

Monday, April 25, 2011

Investopedia: Can St. Jude Live Up To Newfound Expectations?

Investors run hot and cold on stocks all the time, but in all my time following St. Jude Medical (NYSE:STJ) I don't remember too many stretches where St. Jude was a favored name in the device space. That has all changed, though, and relatively quickly, as the company has managed to really sell Wall Street on the prospects for its deep pipeline. (For more on medical companies, check out Investing In Medical Equipment Companies.)

The company clearly has Wall Street's attention. Now the question is whether it can deliver on those promises. St. Jude does indeed have a deep pipeline and a good chance of being one of the most dynamic med-tech companies in the next few years (at least in terms of product launches). With so little underlying growth in many of its core markets, though, the company definitely has some work cut out for itself.  

Q1 Results: Not As Good As They Seem  
St. Jude reported $1.38 billion in first quarter sales, and that was spot-on with analyst expectations. The company's stated growth rate of 9% looks pretty good (as does the currency-neutral rate of 7.7%), but the organic growth picture isn't so impressive. Organic growth for the first quarter was more on the order of 2%, or a bit more than 4% if the some year-ago CRM business is netted out. Now, low-single-digit organic growth is not that out of line with the rest of the medical device sector, but "matching the market" is not the expectations out there for this name. 

To read the full piece, please follow this link:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/Can-St.-Jude-Live-Up-To-Newfound-Expectations-STJ-MDT-BSX-EW-VOLC-ABT-SYK0425.aspx

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Seeking Alpha: Johnson & Johnson: Potential M&A Targets To Recharge Growth, Divert Investor Attention

There is no question that healthcare and personal care giant Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) has been an active acquirer over the years – doing over 20 deals worth more than $40 billion in the last ten years alone. With the company struggling through a dry spell in organic growth and embarrassing itself with a series of product defect (and recall) announcements, it would seem likely that the company will once again lean on M&A to recharge its growth prospects and divert investor attention away from management's own poor recent record.

With that in mind, it seems appropriate to take a look at JNJ's menu of options and its potential shopping list.

A Few General Thoughts

There is nothing wrong with small deals or the acquisition of pre-revenue companies with promising products in the pipeline, but for purposes of this analysis I am only considering major, multi-billion-dollar deals that could meaningfully impact short-term revenue and earnings performance.

Based on what the company has done in the past, it would seem improbable that the company would look too seriously at areas like life sciences (thus excluding names like Thermo Fisher (TMO), Life Technologies (LIFE), or Illumina (ILMN)). Likewise, services would be a big change in strategy, so names like Lab Corp (LH) or Davita (DVA) are likely out, as are imaging or “big iron” companies like Varian (VAR).

Generally speaking, it would also seem that JNJ should target businesses with good emerging market exposure – JNJ has good overall non-US revenue exposure, but not so much in the faster-growing emerging markets.

To read the full piece, please go to Seeking Alpha:
Johnson & Johnson: Potential M&A Targets to Recharge Growth, Divert Investor Attention 

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Investopedia: Medtronic's Midlife Crisis

Companies, like people, do not often grow old gracefully. More often than not, parts stop working right, it takes more effort to achieve the same ends, and the overall pace slows down. While some accept this and do the best they can, others resort to cosmetic fixes to patch over the ravages of age. To that end, Medtronic (NYSE:MDT) seems to be handling its maturity with integrity and realism. 

A Mediocre Quarter
Medtronic's fiscal third quarter results are not likely to excite long-term investors that much. Revenue grew less than 3%, which was mostly in line with analyst expectations and overall medical device sector growth. That, then, is part of the problem with Medtronic - it has matured to a point where it no longer flies ahead of the pack. Looking at some of the details, the company's core CRM business saw revenue decline 2%, while spine grew by 2% and cardio rose better than 7%. Diabetes and surgical technologies were also solid growers (up 10% and 8%, respectively), but they are relatively small businesses for Medtronic. (For more, see Keeping Pace At Medtronic.)

Third quarter earnings quality looks a bit problematic. Although the company did beat the consensus estimate for the quarter, gross margin fell more than a full point, and operating income dropped more than 3% (with operating margin contracted two points). Like so many other companies, an unexpectedly low tax rate allowed the company to meet the earnings bogey, but the quality of that beat is low. (For more, see Strategies Of Quarterly Earnings Season.)


Please continue to the full piece:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/Medtronics-Midlife-Crisis-MDT-STJ-BSX-ABT-EW-ISRG-NUVA0224.aspx

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Investopedia: Med-Tech Choice Is Simply Intuitive

Although 2010 was a lousy year for medical technology stocks, patient investors know that the buyers will return in time. When they do, high-growth companies like Intuitive Surgical (Nasdaq:ISRG) will surely be on the shopping list. For while there are legitimate concerns about how long this company can sustain double-digit system growth, it is much harder to argue away the rising procedure counts and incredible free cash flow conversion performance.


A Strong Finish to the Year 
Intuitive capped 2010 with another estimate-beating performance. Revenue rose 21%, exceeding even the high estimate, as instrument and accessory sales jumped 33%. System sales grew 10%, while service revenue rose 27% for the same period. Revenue growth in instruments was supported by a 35% increase in DaVinci-assisted procedures and a back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that procedure counts per machine per week rose about 8% to around 3.7.  (For more, see A Checklist For Successful Medical Technology Investment.)

While there was almost nothing to quibble with in the top line numbers, the company's operating leverage was not quite up to the same standard. Gross margin rose about 30 basis points from the year-ago level, a somewhat surprising lack of leverage given the larger contribution of instruments and accessories. The company also posted a sizable increase in SG&A and R&D (though few investors really begrudge higher R&D spending for growth med-tech names), and that limited operating income growth to 20% and resulted in a slight decline in operating margin.


Click below for the full piece:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/Med-Tech-Choice-Is-Simply-Intuitive-ISRG-MDT-SYK-GE-SI-STJ-BSX0125.aspx

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

A Good Deal For Boston Scientific?!?!?

I am a hard-core skeptic and smart-ass when it comes to Boston Scientific (NYSE: BSX), but I have to give the company some props for a deal today that could really pay off long-term.

The Deal
Boston Scientific announced this morning that it was acquiring privately-held Atritech in a multi-stage deal. BSX will pay Atritech shareholders $100 million in cash upfront, with as much as $275 million more coming over the next four years if the company hits certain (unspecified) milestones.

Who/What Atritech Is
Atritech is attempting to get U.S. approval for its Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure technology. Put very very simply, the Watchman device that somewhat resembles a hot-air balloon or jellyfish and is designed to prevent blood clots from leaving the left atrial appendage of the heart and potentially causing a stroke or wreaking other havoc.

The device has an expanding nitinol frame and a polyester mesh that basically unfolds when deployed. One of the positive features is that it compacts down in such a way that it can be inserted relatively easily through a transcatheter procedure (not unlike how stents or angioplasty balloons are delivered). Like stents, it is designed to be left in place permanently.

The Watchman has been designed as a mechanical alternative to the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation, which affects anywhere from 3 million to 7 million people based on whose numbers you use, can be a very serious disease - due in part to the fact that it often leads to the formation of clots that migrate and cause problems like stroke. While some atrial fibrillation patients are managed with medication to stop or reduce the condition (like Multaq from Sanofi-Aventis (NYSE: SNY), others do not respond and go on clot-preventing drugs like warfarin. Unfortunately, warfarin has a lot of problems of its own and is not really a desirable long-term therapy.

A Big Market ... For The Right Device
With a market potential of $1 billion or more, many companies have tried to advance device-based approaches to the disease. Companies like Atricure (Nasdaq: ATRC) and Medtronic (NYSE: MDT) have gone the route of ablation (basically burning or freezing heart tissue to stop the a-fib). Others, like AGA Medical (since acquired by St. Jude (NYSE: STJ)) have tried the implant route.

So far, though, nobody has really captured the hearts and minds of doctors and the FDA. Defibrillation does not work all that often, and ablation success rates have been pretty mixed as well. In fact, so many mechanical approaches have been tried (unsuccessfully), I think some docs have gotten a little jaded about the market and device-based approaches. Still, build a winner and they will change their minds eventually. 

Questions Still To Be Answered
Although Atritech has promise, it's not a slam-dunk. The company's first pivotal study, PROTECT, was a success, but not an unqualified success. There was a 38% reduction in endpoint events (stroke, cardiovascular death, etc.) in the patients receiving the Watchman, and 87% of those recipients were able to discontinue warfarin within 45 days of the procedure.

Unfortunately, there were some problems. The success rate of the implantation was 91% and that strikes me as a bit problematic, though perhaps that number can improve with training. Of greater concern to the FDA, though, was the relatively short duration of the study (for what will be a lifetime implant) and the possibility that the study cherry-picked patients in a way that excluded those more likely to have bad outcomes.

As a result, though the company got a narrow FDA panel approval in April of 2009 (7 to 5 in favor), the FDA was not convinced. The FDA has insisted on a small confirmatory study, and the company has launched the PREVAIL study with an expected enrollment completion in 2012.

With that sort of enrollment completion target, it is probably not reasonable to expect FDA approval until 2015. That, in turn, is probably why the company is selling to BSX today. This is not a great funding environment for development-stage med-tech and Atritech probably was not going to get enough revenue and cash flow from its foreign sales of Watchman to avoid further rounds of dilutive financing.

The Bottom Line
For BSX, this is clearly not a deal that helps them today or tomorrow. It's a deal that could, however, pay big dividends in the future and give the company a credible chance of being a player in a major undeveloped market. Moreover, I do not think the company is overpaying - a lot of the purchase price is contingent and BSX may find that they ultimately paid less than 1x annual revenue from the device if everything works out.

Frankly, I would have liked to have seen a better outcome for Atritech. Atritech's CEO, Jim Bullock, is a really good guy - I worked with him when he was the CEO of Endocardial Solutions (which he sold to St. Jude a while ago) and we at Piper Jaffray were basically his go-to analysts and bankers. Still, a sale is a sale and this deal was likely the best choice of less-than-perfect menu of options.

Does this radically change the outlook for Boston Scientific? No way. A winning device in a-fib would be a big plus for this company, but that won't materialize for at least four years (if at all). By the same token, investors in BSX should expect more deals like this Atritech transaction. Boston Scientific needs to reinvent itself and recharge its pipeline. Unfortunately, BSX's current financial and stock market condition is such that buying hot near-term ideas is probably prohibitively expensive/dilutive. So, I look for them to keep doing deals whereby they acquire promising, but not fully proven, technologies with a lot of the purchase price hinging on ultimate success. 
 

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Stryker Pulls The Trigger

Funny how rumors work. There were widely-spread rumors that Stryker (NYSE: SYK) and Boston Scientific (NYSE: BSX) were talking deal, with Stryker being seen as a likely buyer for BSX's neuromodulation business.

Well ... the rumors were partially right. Stryker and Boston Scientific did announce a deal, but in a real twist Stryker decided to buy BSX's neurovascular business for $1.4 billion in cash and potentially another $100 million in earn-outs. Unlike the neuromodulation business, which largely involves pacemaker-like devices that deliver controlled electrical pulses to nerves or tissue to control conditions like pain, the neurovascular business involves stroke treatment and prevention, with a suite of products including wires, catheters, balloons, and embolic coils.

It's a curious decision. Neuromodulation is sometimes seen as a logical fit with orthopedics since so much of the demand for the devices is in pain relief following unsuccessful back surgery. Moreover, BSX's under-investment in this business and flagging competitiveness relative to Medtronic (NYSE: MDT) and St. Jude (NYSE: STJ) had many looking at it as a solid fix'er-up/turnaround opportunity.

In the neurovascular business, Stryker is buying a unit that should produce in excess of $300 million in revenue and has been a market leader. Unfortunately, BSX has been losing ground to competition from ev3 (now part of Covidien (NYSE: COV)) and Micrus (now part of Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ)). Part of the problem here is a lack of innovation and simply falling behind in terms of product performance. Although there has been some optimism about new devices that will roll out over the next couple of years, the general thought has been that Boston Scientific was dangerously close to becoming a "has been" - at least in terms of leading-edge devices.

I have to give BSX credit, though, and that is not something I do often - they got a fine price for this unit. While there is absolutely every chance that this can be a lucrative unit for Stryker, it will need some work and Stryker will be competing against large and experienced rivals. So, to get 4.5x sales (assuming the full earn-out) for the unit, BSX did well. By comparison, Micrus got a multiple of about 5.2x, while ev3 sold out for a similar amount.

To an extent, Stryker had to do this deal - they need to inject more growth into the business, and neither orthopedics, surgical instruments, or hospital equipment are likely to do it. What's more, there are not too many obvious alternatives for the company - wound care is a tough business, and entering robotics (presumably by buying Intuitive Surgical (Nasdaq: ISRG)) would have been enormously expensive.

For BSX, the cash will be welcome and can either go towards paying down debt or identifying some small early-stage tech ideas for acquisition.

All in all, it's amusing to see how the conventional rumors were wrong on this deal. It's also an interesting sign of what lengths Stryker needs to go to to get growth these days; while the stock looks cheap maybe I need to reconsider some of my growth assumptions.

Disclosure - I own shares of JNJ