Apologies for being so late to post this, but regular readers know how things are...
My performance for 2015 was okay, and given all of the other things going on in my life I'll look at it as a decent year.
Portfolio A: +8%
Portfolio B: -10.5%
S&P 500: +1.38%
Nasdaq: +5.73%
Russell 3000: +0.48%
Showing posts with label performance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label performance. Show all posts
Sunday, February 7, 2016
Sunday, January 25, 2015
Performance - A Lousy, Mixed Up, No Good Year
Last year was a
lousy year for a lousy reason … and that reason is part of why it
took me almost four weeks into this month to get this post written.
My wife/partner of 22 years was diagnosed with advanced cancer in
2014 and suffice it to say that helping and supporting her took
precedence for the last third of the year as she went through
surgery, radiation, and chemo. For the last three months of the year,
I wrote fewer pieces in each month than I typically do in two or
three days, so you can imagine how much time I was spending paying
close attention to the markets.
Anyways, on with
the show...
I maintain two
separate portfolios (“A” and “B”). Portfolio A is supposed to
be a more actively managed portfolio with a greater focus on
year-to-year returns. Portfolio B is supposed to be more about
long-term opportunities; I don't care so much about the year-to-year
performance of holdings so much as the potential/performance over
three or more years.
Portfolio
A did okay in 2014, beating the S&P 500 and Russell 3000 but
lagging the Nasdaq. The biggest positive contributors were Alnylam
(ALNY) and Neurocrine Biosciences
(NBIX), followed by Multi-Color
(LABL). Hurco (HURC)
and the Wright Medical Group CVRs
(WMGIZ) both did well but make up a relatively small part of the
assets. ABB (ABB),
First Cash Financial (FCFS) and
FEMSA (FMX) were the
biggest drags on performance; Cameron
(CAM), Lundbeck
(HLUYY), Weatherford
(WFT), and Ultratech
(UTEK) were all laggards, but less meaningful given their smaller
allocation.
Portfolio
B was a total mess, lagging all of the indexes I care about and doing
just generally rotten on its own. I suppose I could blame some of it
on a lack of attention in the last third of the year, but the numbers
are what they are. Alnylam, Broadcom
(BRCM), and EMC (EMC)
were the most meaningful positive contributors, while Statoil
(STO), Triangle Petroleum
(TPLM), and FEMSA were the biggest losers in the mix.
On a combined
basis, the results weren't nearly good enough. The three-year and
five-year numbers are still decent, but hopefully I can get back to
the sort of performance I expect on a year-in/year-out basis.
2014 Returns
Portfolio A: +14.2%
Portfolio B: +
11.5%
Combined Portfolios: +13.53%
S&P 500: +13.69%
Nasdaq: +
14.75%
Russell 3000: +
12.56%
Three-Year Returns (annualized)
Portfolio A:
+24.1%
Portfolio B: +16.9%
Combined Portfolios: +21.3%
S&P 500:
+20.4%Nasdaq: +23.6%Russell
3000: +20.5%
Labels:
performance
Saturday, January 11, 2014
2013 Performance Numbers
I apologize for being a little slow in getting my performance numbers up. It was a decent enough year for me, but not as good as I expect from myself. My more aggressively-managed account did beat the S&P 500 and Russell 3000, while my more conservatively-run account lagged and dragged down the overall returns. On a risk-adjusted basis, though, I'm reasonably happy with the results, as Portfolio A and the combined portfolios had positive alpha for the year.
2013 Returns
Portfolio A: +34.9%
Portfolio B: +25.7%
Combined Portfolios: +31.0%
S&P 500: +32.4%
Nasdaq: +40.1%
Russell 3000: +33.6%
Portfolio A Alpha: +3.7%
Portfolio B Alpha: -1.3%
Combined Portfolio Alpha: +1.3%
Portfolio A:
Winners: Alnylam (+252%), Senomyx (+201%), Multi-Color (+58%), 3M (+54%), Societe Generale (+51%)
Losers: Commercial Vehicle Group (-12%), Ultratech (-4%), FEMSA (-0.4%), Brasil Foods (+0.1%), EMC (+0.2%)
Portfolio B:
Winners: Alnylam (+252%), Senomyx (+201%), Societe Generale (+51%), Manitex (+45%), Roche (+42%)
Losers: Lexicon Pharmaceuticals (-19%), Turkcell (-17%), Ultratech (-4%), FEMSA (-0.4%), Statoil (-0.2%)
* Please note, those returns reflect the returns while they were in my account.
Three-Year Returns
Portfolio A: +18.9%
Portfolio B: +16.6%
Combined Portfolios: +18.1%
S&P 500: +16.2%
Nasdaq: +17.7%
Russell 3000: +16.2%
Five-Year Returns
Portfolio A: +21.7%
Portfolio B: +19.3%
Combined Portfolios: +20.7%
S&P 500: +17.9%
Nasdaq: +22.9%
Russell 3000: +18.7%
Disclosure: I own all of the shares mentioned in this post.
Labels:
performance
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Q1 2013 Performance Update
The first quarter was another strong one for my portfolio(s). A significant percentage of my holdings are at, or above, fair value and I'm starting to worry that U.S. markets (and many foreign markets) are getting overheated. While I'd rather hold overpriced shares of a good company than undervalued shares of inferior companies, I will likely be looking to shift some capital towards stocks with more compelling valuations.
Q!'13 Performance
Portfolio A - +15.2%
Portfolio B - +9.4%
Combined Portfolios - +13.2%
S&P 500 - +10.0%
Nasdaq - +8.2%
Russell 3000 - +10.5%
Please note that the market performance figures do not include dividends, which I would estimate would add about 0.5% to the S&P 500 performance number.
Q!'13 Performance
Portfolio A - +15.2%
Portfolio B - +9.4%
Combined Portfolios - +13.2%
S&P 500 - +10.0%
Nasdaq - +8.2%
Russell 3000 - +10.5%
Please note that the market performance figures do not include dividends, which I would estimate would add about 0.5% to the S&P 500 performance number.
Labels:
performance
Saturday, January 5, 2013
More Detailed Performance Review
I've had a little time to catch up, and now I can present the "full and final" performance numbers for my portfolios in 2012.
Portfolio A: +27.3%
Portfolio B: +26.8%
Combined Portfolios: +27.1%
S&P 500 (total return): +16.0%
Nasdaq Comp: +17.5%
Russell 3000: +16.4%
Portfolio A Alpha: 11.8%
Portfolio B Alpha: 13.5%
Combined Portfolios Alpha: 12.4%
I'm pleased with these results. The beta in my A portfolio ticked up slightly in Q4, while the Portfolio B beta ticked down a bit, but they continue to perform basically the way I want (B being the lower-beta portfolio).
I won't go through a complete performance attribution, but I will say that the follow were major positive (and negative) contributors for the year:
Portfolio A:
Winners: BMTI (+149%), ALNY (+111%), SCGLY (+70%), PRAA (+56%)
Losers: SNMX (-56%), TWGP (-13%), AES (-12%)
Portfolio B:
Winners: ALNY (+111%), LXRX (+77%), SCGLY (+70%), FMX (+44%)
Losers: SNMX (-56%), TWGP (-13%), AMX (0%), MSM (+5%)
Clearly biotech was a big positive contributor to 2012 results, and I can say that various buyouts within my portfolio were a big help as well. By no means do I expect to replicate 2012's results this year, but here's hoping!
Portfolio A: +27.3%
Portfolio B: +26.8%
Combined Portfolios: +27.1%
S&P 500 (total return): +16.0%
Nasdaq Comp: +17.5%
Russell 3000: +16.4%
Portfolio A Alpha: 11.8%
Portfolio B Alpha: 13.5%
Combined Portfolios Alpha: 12.4%
I'm pleased with these results. The beta in my A portfolio ticked up slightly in Q4, while the Portfolio B beta ticked down a bit, but they continue to perform basically the way I want (B being the lower-beta portfolio).
I won't go through a complete performance attribution, but I will say that the follow were major positive (and negative) contributors for the year:
Portfolio A:
Winners: BMTI (+149%), ALNY (+111%), SCGLY (+70%), PRAA (+56%)
Losers: SNMX (-56%), TWGP (-13%), AES (-12%)
Portfolio B:
Winners: ALNY (+111%), LXRX (+77%), SCGLY (+70%), FMX (+44%)
Losers: SNMX (-56%), TWGP (-13%), AMX (0%), MSM (+5%)
Clearly biotech was a big positive contributor to 2012 results, and I can say that various buyouts within my portfolio were a big help as well. By no means do I expect to replicate 2012's results this year, but here's hoping!
Labels:
performance
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Second Quarter Performance
I thought I had posted this the weekend after the end of the second quarter, but either I messed up or there was some issue with Blogspot. In any case, I'm re-posting it here.
The slowdown in industrials did me no favors, nor did the issues in Brazil or at JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM). That said, it could have been a lot worse. I have a fair bit of dry powder now, and I'm looking to get more active after second quarter earnings.
Q2'12 Performance
Portfolio A - (5.0%)
Portfolio B - (0.1%)
Combined Portfolios - (3.2%)
S&P 500 - (3.3%)
Nasdaq - (5.1%)
Russell 3000 - (3.7%)
YTD Performance
Portfolio A - +11.0%
Portfolio B - +15.1%
Combined Portfolios - +12.5%
S&P 500 - +8.3%
Nasdaq - +12.7%
Russell 3000 - +8.2%
Disclosure: I own shares of JPMorgan
The slowdown in industrials did me no favors, nor did the issues in Brazil or at JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM). That said, it could have been a lot worse. I have a fair bit of dry powder now, and I'm looking to get more active after second quarter earnings.
Q2'12 Performance
Portfolio A - (5.0%)
Portfolio B - (0.1%)
Combined Portfolios - (3.2%)
S&P 500 - (3.3%)
Nasdaq - (5.1%)
Russell 3000 - (3.7%)
YTD Performance
Portfolio A - +11.0%
Portfolio B - +15.1%
Combined Portfolios - +12.5%
S&P 500 - +8.3%
Nasdaq - +12.7%
Russell 3000 - +8.2%
Disclosure: I own shares of JPMorgan
Labels:
performance
Sunday, April 1, 2012
First Quarter Performance
So, the first quarter is in the books. It was a so-so quarter. Certainly plenty of my holdings did really well, but once again my policy of "enlightened sloth" came with some costs - namely missing out on some pretty impressive runs in tech names.
With two of my holdings accepting buyout bids this quarter, I'll definitely have cash to reinvest quite soon.
Q1'12 Performance
Portfolio A - +16.9%
Portfolio B - +15.2%
Combined Portfolios - +16.3%
S&P 500 - +12.0%
Nasdaq - +18.7%
Russell 3000 - +12.3%
YTD Performance
Portfolio A - +16.9%
Portfolio B - +15.2%
Combined Portfolios - +16.3%
S&P 500 - +12.0%
Nasdaq - +18.7%
Russell 3000 - +12.3%
With two of my holdings accepting buyout bids this quarter, I'll definitely have cash to reinvest quite soon.
Q1'12 Performance
Portfolio A - +16.9%
Portfolio B - +15.2%
Combined Portfolios - +16.3%
S&P 500 - +12.0%
Nasdaq - +18.7%
Russell 3000 - +12.3%
YTD Performance
Portfolio A - +16.9%
Portfolio B - +15.2%
Combined Portfolios - +16.3%
S&P 500 - +12.0%
Nasdaq - +18.7%
Russell 3000 - +12.3%
Labels:
performance
Sunday, January 1, 2012
The Tale Of The Tape For 2011
What can I say about 2011 other than “good riddance”?
In many respects, 2011 actually wasn't that bad of a year. There were plenty of good ideas out there and plenty of chances to make a profit. Unfortunately, I seemed to have a frustrating predilection for self-inflicted wounds this year. Mistakes are normal and I accept them as part of the endeavor; dumb mistakes drive me stark raving mad.
To offer one example – had I used my time-tested method for selling and preserving gains in just a single stock (Sauer-Danfoss), I would have beaten the market this year and kept that streak alive for another year. Had I not been lazy or ambivalent about Pharmasset and actually added that to my portfolio, I would have likewise managed to keep the streak alive.
Then again, I almost bought Hypermarcas and Cline Mining at various points in the year, and not doing so proved to be returns-saving moves as well. And so it goes – much as I may lament that “one mistake” that screwed up my performance, I have to acknowledge that I got plenty of boons that likewise boosted my performance.
And without further ado, here are the disappointing numbers for 2011:
Portfolio A: (2.8%)
Portfolio B: (0.8%)
Combined portfolios: (2.2%)
S&P 500: (0.0%)
Nasdaq: (1.8%)
I own shares of Sauer-Danfoss
Labels:
performance
Saturday, October 1, 2011
Third Quarter Performance
No point in sugar-coating it, my performance in the third quarter was absolutely abysmal.
In retrospect, it's abjectly obvious that I hung on too long to names like Sauer-Danfoss (NYSE: SHS), Portfolio Recovery (Nasdaq: PRAA), and ISTA (Nasdaq: ISTA), and probably should have cut bait on names like Commercial Vehicle Group (Nasdaq: CVGI) a long, long time ago.
On the other hand, I believe in buying good companies and holding them for as long as the businesses are good ... so I'm not going to beat myself up just because it crushed my performance (and wrecked my YTD performance as well).
Going forward, I have money to invest and I'm getting a little twitchy about the energy and resource names, as well as some tech names. Yeah, if we tip over into recession those names will get smacked, but then so will most of what I own anyway. It's not often that names like Freeport McMoRan (NYSE: FCX) or F5 (Nasdaq: FFIV) get close to cheap, so maybe now's the time.
Q3'11 Performance
Portfolio A - (19.0%)
Portfolio B - (11.5%)
Combined Portfolios - (16.5%)
S&P 500 - (14.3%)
Nasdaq - (12.9%)
Russell 3000 - (15.7%)
YTD Performance
Portfolio A - (11.2%)
Portfolio B - (4.1%)
Combined Portfolios - (8.8%)
S&P 500 - (10.0%)
Nasdaq - (9.0%)
Russell 3000 - (11.1%)
Disclosure: I own shares of Sauer-Danfoss, Portfolio Recovery, ISTA, and CVGI
In retrospect, it's abjectly obvious that I hung on too long to names like Sauer-Danfoss (NYSE: SHS), Portfolio Recovery (Nasdaq: PRAA), and ISTA (Nasdaq: ISTA), and probably should have cut bait on names like Commercial Vehicle Group (Nasdaq: CVGI) a long, long time ago.
On the other hand, I believe in buying good companies and holding them for as long as the businesses are good ... so I'm not going to beat myself up just because it crushed my performance (and wrecked my YTD performance as well).
Going forward, I have money to invest and I'm getting a little twitchy about the energy and resource names, as well as some tech names. Yeah, if we tip over into recession those names will get smacked, but then so will most of what I own anyway. It's not often that names like Freeport McMoRan (NYSE: FCX) or F5 (Nasdaq: FFIV) get close to cheap, so maybe now's the time.
Q3'11 Performance
Portfolio A - (19.0%)
Portfolio B - (11.5%)
Combined Portfolios - (16.5%)
S&P 500 - (14.3%)
Nasdaq - (12.9%)
Russell 3000 - (15.7%)
YTD Performance
Portfolio A - (11.2%)
Portfolio B - (4.1%)
Combined Portfolios - (8.8%)
S&P 500 - (10.0%)
Nasdaq - (9.0%)
Russell 3000 - (11.1%)
Disclosure: I own shares of Sauer-Danfoss, Portfolio Recovery, ISTA, and CVGI
Labels:
performance
Friday, July 1, 2011
Second Quarter Performance
In a word, "blech".
I actually have far more colorful descriptions of this quarter's performance, but I try to keep the language here family-friendly (which is no doubt a major shock to those who actually know me!).
In any case, this was a lousy, frustrating, pain-in-the-butt kind of quarter. There's no question that a few big disappointments weighed on results. BioMimetic Therapeutics (Nasdaq: BMTI) has gotten absolutely crushed ever since a pretty iffy FDA panel meeting (and a reset of expectations that its product will get bounced by the agency). ISTA Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: ISTA) did great and then gave most of it back, and my bank stocks did mostly nothing.
Making matter worse, I know the ultimate end-of-quarter performance isn't really as good as it looks. I think the big run-up in the last week or two was window dressing and I think a lot of it is going to evaporate.
Ugh. The joys of investing, right?
So, without further adieu (or whining), here's the numbers:
Q2'11 Performance
Portfolio A - (2.6%)
Portfolio B - +2.8%
Combined Portfolios - (0.8%)
S&P 500 - (0.4%)
Nasdaq - (0.3%)
Russell 3000 - (0.5%)
YTD Performance
Portfolio A - +9.7%
Portfolio B - +8.4%
Combined Portfolios - +9.2%
S&P 500 - +5.0%
Nasdaq - +4.5%
Russell 3000 - +5.4%
Disclosure - I own shares of BioMimetic and ISTA
I actually have far more colorful descriptions of this quarter's performance, but I try to keep the language here family-friendly (which is no doubt a major shock to those who actually know me!).
In any case, this was a lousy, frustrating, pain-in-the-butt kind of quarter. There's no question that a few big disappointments weighed on results. BioMimetic Therapeutics (Nasdaq: BMTI) has gotten absolutely crushed ever since a pretty iffy FDA panel meeting (and a reset of expectations that its product will get bounced by the agency). ISTA Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: ISTA) did great and then gave most of it back, and my bank stocks did mostly nothing.
Making matter worse, I know the ultimate end-of-quarter performance isn't really as good as it looks. I think the big run-up in the last week or two was window dressing and I think a lot of it is going to evaporate.
Ugh. The joys of investing, right?
So, without further adieu (or whining), here's the numbers:
Q2'11 Performance
Portfolio A - (2.6%)
Portfolio B - +2.8%
Combined Portfolios - (0.8%)
S&P 500 - (0.4%)
Nasdaq - (0.3%)
Russell 3000 - (0.5%)
YTD Performance
Portfolio A - +9.7%
Portfolio B - +8.4%
Combined Portfolios - +9.2%
S&P 500 - +5.0%
Nasdaq - +4.5%
Russell 3000 - +5.4%
Disclosure - I own shares of BioMimetic and ISTA
Labels:
performance
Friday, April 1, 2011
First Quarter Performance
This was an odd opening to the year. Through the first two months of the quarter, I was down a bit relative to the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq. March has been a real lion for me, though, with stocks like First Cash (FCFS), Sauer-Danfoss (SHS), ISTA (ISTA), and TomoTherapy (TOMO) all really coming through for me in a big way.
First quarter 2011 -
Portfolio A : +12.6%
Portfolio B: +5.4%
Combined portfolios: +10.1%
S&P 500: +5.4%
Nasdaq: +4.8%
Russell 3000: +5.9%
Disclosure - I own shares of First Cash Financial, Sauer-Danfoss, ISTA Pharmaceuticals, and TomoTherapy
First quarter 2011 -
Portfolio A : +12.6%
Portfolio B: +5.4%
Combined portfolios: +10.1%
S&P 500: +5.4%
Nasdaq: +4.8%
Russell 3000: +5.9%
Disclosure - I own shares of First Cash Financial, Sauer-Danfoss, ISTA Pharmaceuticals, and TomoTherapy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)