Seeking Alpha: Copa Holdings Looks Undervalued, But Its Markets Likely Haven't Bottomed

Copa Holdings (NYSE:CPA) and Alaska Air (NYSE:ALK) make for an interesting study in contrasts. Both are well-run airlines by most of the metrics that matter, but they operate in very different markets. While Alaska Air continues to benefit from a benign-to-healthy U.S. airline industry environment, Copa is getting crushed by economic turbulence in major markets like Brazil, Venezuela, and Colombia. Since the time of my last article on Copa, the shares have fallen more than 40% while Alaska Air's shares have climbed nearly 25%. That Copa has outperformed GOL (NYSE:GOL) and Avianca (NYSE:AVH) is true, but doesn't put any money back into shareholders' pockets.

I do believe that the current share price discounts the long-term value of Copa, but it's hard to make money in the midst of weak reported results and lower expectations. Likewise, it's worth at least asking why investors should expect any meaningful turnaround in Brazil, Venezuela, or Colombia in the near term, as these are all commodity-driven markets that need a combination of higher oil, base metal, and agricultural prices to lead a turnaround.

Read the full article here:

Copa Holdings Looks Undervalued, But Its Markets Likely Haven't Bottomed

Seeking Alpha: Alaska Air Making The Most Of Its Opportunities

I hate avoiding the shares of really good companies just because they look a little pricey, and Alaska Air Group (NYSE:ALK) is a good example of why that is. I liked the company back in February and thought that the shares had upside into the $70s, but the stock has managed to touch the high $80s this year and sits more than 25% higher than when I wrote that last article. Since that time, Alaska Air has continued to compete very effectively - not only withstanding Delta Air Lines' (NYSE:DAL) aggressive expansion in Seattle, but also adding several new routes of its own and leveraging its cost advantages.

And now we come back to the perpetual issue with Alaska Air's shares - valuation. At a 5.5x multiple to EBITDAR, the shares are about fairly valued, while a 6x multiple (still within the bounds of normal for an airline) adds about $8/share to the fair value and bumps the undervaluation up over 10%. Looking at free cash flow, today's price seems to be pricing in mid-to-high single-digit annualized FCF growth from 2015's estimated end point, and that's pretty generous for an airline.

Follow this link for more:
Alaska Air Making The Most Of Its Opportunities

Seeking Alpha: IPG Photonics Still On Top Of A Rising Mountain

I've made no secret of the fact that I like and admire IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP), and I can't say that the shares haven't rewarded that enthusiasm. Since my first piece for Seeking Alpha on the company, the shares are up more than 60%, trouncing other laser companies like Rofin-Sinar (NASDAQ:RSTI), Coherent (NASDAQ:COHR), and Newport (NASDAQ:NEWP), and beating the NASDAQ by a relatively comfortable margin as well.

When I last wrote about the company, the business was running quite smoothly, but I was concerned about the expectations baked into the valuation. The shares have been more or less flat since then on a "net" basis, but I did suggest that investors could look for dips into the $80s as buying opportunities and investors got two such chances (including a move into the $70s).

Now what? I still like this business, and I think IPG Photonics is poised for a decade of revenue growth that averages out to around 9% to 10% a year coupled with excellent free cash flow margins. I do have some worries about the potential of "peak margin", as well as the possibility that IPG Photonics' growth will make it more susceptible to the vagaries of the machine tool cycles, but no stock comes without risks. The shares do look a little undervalued now, but I'd be tempted to try another "buy the dip" move given the macro uncertainties.

Continue here:
IPG Photonics Still On Top Of A Rising Mountain

Seeking Alpha: Manitex Struggling As The Boom Cycle Goes Bust

It's cold comfort when one of the nicest things you can say about a long call is that the company's peers have gotten hammered about the same in the intervening time. Manitex (NASDAQ:MNTX) borrowed extensively to fund an M&A program that has taken the company from around $100 million a year in revenue in 2010 to almost $100 million a quarter now, but the severe downturn in the energy market has hammered this company and pushed operating margins back into the low single digits. Although I think Manitex could still pay its interest even with a 10% sales decline next year and negative gross margin leverage, the situation is far from ideal today.

This is not just a Manitex-specific problem. Manitowoc (NYSE:MTW) is down about as much since the last time I wrote about Manitex, and Terex (NYSE:TEX) has done worse. Europe's Manitou (OTC:MAOIF), which is largely screened from the energy-related downturn in the U.S., hasn't done much better either.

At the risk of not knowing when to quit, I think Manitex still has a worthwhile future. The company's acquisition of PM Group gives the company better exposure to what should be an improving European construction sector in 2016, not to mention exposure to growth in North America (where PM Group has been historically under-represented). I think it's early (or at least very aggressive) to expect an energy recovery, but PM Group and ASV do at least give Manitex more leveraging to a healthier construction sector in North America.

Read the full article here:
Manitex Struggling As The Boom Cycle Goes Bust

Seeking Alpha: Persistent Sluggishness In The U.S. A Growing Problem For First Cash Financial

It's getting harder and harder to give First Cash Financial (NASDAQ:FCFS) the benefit of the doubt. While the currency issues that are pressuring the reported revenue from the company's large Mexican operations are arguably forgivable, the persistent sluggishness in the U.S. operations is harder to excuse. What's worse, I don't think investors are, or should be, all that happy that the company has committed sizable amounts of capital towards consolidating the slow-growing U.S. pawn market and held off on expanding into faster-growing regions like Colombia and Peru.

Cutting expectations for a stock you've recommended is never fun, and it's even less so when you own the shares yourself. The reality, though, is that First Cash has been a rotten stock over the last year, with the shares down about 30%. While there is still an opportunity for First Cash to generate high single-digit to low double-digit growth in Mexico for years to come and generate better margins from the U.S. operations, this is very much a "show me" story today.

Read more here:
Persistent Sluggishness In The U.S. A Growing Problem For First Cash Financial

Seeking Alpha: JPMorgan's Steady Progress Not Fully Rewarded

It may be boring, but JPMorgan Chase's (NYSE:JPM) ability to deliver on the "blocking and tackling" issues identified by management continues to build value for long-term shareholders of this enormous financial institution. More specifically, JPMorgan's management has managed to reduce its GSIB buffer and make progress on cost reductions while simultaneously driving above-average loan growth.

These improvements have led me to adjust my revenue and earnings targets, as well as the company's risk premium, and those improvements support a higher fair value. JPMorgan definitely has a delicate balancing act to maintain between further reducing its buffers and costs and not alienating customers, not to mention balancing the risk of expanded credit and credit losses, and maintaining leading market share in multiple businesses without getting dragged into a race to the bottom on pricing.

JPMorgan appears to be handling this balancing act with considerable skill. Given that, as well as the higher fair value and a generally "meh" attitude towards banks over the past six months, I think JPMorgan is looking a little more interesting as a new buy.

Read the full article here:
JPMorgan's Steady Progress Not Fully Rewarded

Seeking Alpha: The Going's Getting Tougher - Will ABB Keep Going?

The outlook for industrial companies, particularly early-cycle companies, is looking worse as 2015 draws to a close. While a few sectors look as though they could do well in 2016, many sectors with significant capex spending like mining, energy, trucks, and autos are starting to look weak. For Swiss power and automation conglomerate ABB (NYSE:ABB), the weakness in mining, oil/gas, chemicals, and auto manufacturing is definitely a threat, and a call for stronger utility spending in the year ahead is definitely not a consensus call.

The good news is that it doesn't look as though ABB's management is just hiding under their desks and waiting for the storm to pass. Management has started up some relatively meaningful cost-cutting programs and is now examining whether they want to stay in the power grid business for the long term. Add in a healthy balance sheet that would facilitate M&A, and I think ABB is in okay shape heading into this downturn.

The shares are a trickier call right now. More often than not, buying into a downturn doesn't really work well. The exception is if and when the company in question manages to produce "less bad" performance than expected. I believe there's a chance for ABB to do that, and I do believe that these shares trade at a double-digit discount to fair value. That said, this company has earned some of the doubts around it concerning its margin leverage, its ability to spot and navigate industry downturns, and its ability to execute on value-additive M&A.

Continue here:
The Going's Getting Tougher - Will ABB Keep Going?

Seeking Alpha: BB&T Has A Full To-Do List For 2016

Back in July, I thought BB&T (NYSE:BBT) looked a little rich from a valuation perspective, and the shares have sold off about 5% since then - modestly underperforming peers like U.S. Bancorp (NYSE:USB), Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC), PNC (NYSE:PNC), and Fifth Third (NASDAQ:FITB). Since that time, the company has increased its interest sensitivity a bit, announced another acquisition focused on Pennsylvania, and reiterated its commitment to grow by acquisitions while getting a little more conservative on overall loan growth.

Looking ahead, I don't think BB&T is done doing deals, but I don't believe the company is as likely to pull the trigger in 2016 unless a can't-miss opportunity comes along. Instead, I expect the company to prioritize the integration of its recent acquisitions and particularly the realization of expense synergies. At the same time, I would look for the company to try to offset pricing pressure in its insurance brokerage operations with greater volume and continue to develop its specialty lending operations.

I would describe BB&T's current valuation as "okay". The company paid up for its Pennsylvania acquisitions and its going to take time for those deals to show their value, putting even more pressure on those expense synergies. In the meantime, I like BB&T's strong credit quality and its disciplined approach to loan growth. Investors willing to take the elevated risk will find better banking bargains outside the U.S., but with a fair value in the low $40's, BB&T might be worth a look again today.

Read more here:
BB&T Has A Full To-Do List For 2016

Seeking Alpha: Lenovo Looking To Have The Last Seat When The Music Stops

It's easy to dismiss Lenovo (OTCPK:LNVGY) right now. What sane management team would want to be in the PC business when shipments are declining at a double-digit rate? What sane management company would want to battle high-end smartphone champion Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and low-end dynamo Xaomi with the rusty blade that is Motorola at their side? Why would anybody think there's money to be made in a server business that IBM (NYSE:IBM) didn't want?

What I think many of the superficial analyses of Lenovo miss is that this is a company with a proven ability to squeeze blood from a stone and relentlessly drive costs lower. While PCs are likely never going to be a growth market again, I do think there's still an opportunity for Lenovo to gain share and take what growth is there. Likewise, I don't think Lenovo ever unseats Apple in smartphones, but I believe Lenovo's cost structure can allow it to be one of the last companies standing after the industry shakes out the weaker players. Finally, I think there's meaningful server growth opportunity in China and other emerging markets, and here too I believe Lenovo has an opportunity to benefit from stripping costs out of the IBM assets and running the business more cost-effectively.

I've decided to take a more negative view of Lenovo's revenue growth prospects, as the decline in PC shipments has been exceeding my expectations from a year ago and the smartphone market too has cooled more quickly than I expected. Nevertheless, even with a lower revenue growth rate, the opportunity to add around a point and a half to operating margin over time and a similar amount to FCF margin supports a fair value above $28.

Lenovo has to achieve its cost-reduction goals for the Motorola business on schedule to rebuild investor/analyst trust, but I believe Lenovo has seen the bottom in mobile and servers and will surprise with what it does over the next three to five years. More importantly, I think Lenovo has a cost structure and a cost philosophy that makes it a long-term survivor - as virtually every market eventually becomes a commodity market over time, cost leadership is ultimately what distinguishes the survivors and I believe Lenovo has the corporate DNA to be the last (or at least one of the last) players standing in PCs, x86 servers, and phones.

Follow this link for more:
Lenovo Looking To Have The Last Seat When The Music Stops

Seeking Alpha: Does 3M Have Enough Cards Left To Play?

The current management team at 3M (NYSE:MMM) has done a lot to address the issues that used to contribute to the stock's historical relative undervaluation. Management has streamlined the company and boosted margins, maintained a strong internal R&D culture, continued to diversify geographically (particularly into faster-growing emerging markets), levered up to buy back shares, and gotten active on strategic M&A.

The market has noticed, and over CEO Inge Thulin's tenure the shares have outperformed the S&P 500 by about 15%. The shares have also outperformed peers/comps like General Electric (NYSE:GE) while keeping up with the likes of Honeywell (NYSE:HON), Danaher (NYSE:DHR), and Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW).

The question I have, though, is whether 3M has enough cards left to play to continue that run of outperformance. Next year is looking pretty rough for the "general industrial" markets that make up a lot of 3M's business, not to mention the emerging markets that contributes to about one-third of the company's sales. Along similar lines, 3M doesn't have a lot of exposure to commercial aerospace or construction and I'm not sure there's too much left to accomplish on the restructuring side. Large M&A is still a possibility, but a transformative deal that moves the company into new markets would frankly be a little out of character.

Read the full article here:
Does 3M Have Enough Cards Left To Play?

Seeking Alpha: SK Telecom May Be Cheap For Some Good Reasons

I wasn't particularly bullish on SK Telecom (NYSE:SKM) back in April, but I thought the combination of more disciplined competition in the South Korean mobile market and increasing growth of LTE subs would at least be good for dividend coverage. As it turns out, growing MVNO subs and fierce rate competition have kept a lid on per-user growth, leading to several underwhelming quarters at the operating line. What's worse, it looks like management hasn't completely moved beyond its value destroying aspirations of empire building.

I guess the good news here is that the business hasn't eroded as dramatically as the 20%-plus decline in the share price might otherwise suggest. In fact, a lot of what's wrong with SK Telecom's share price performance could be tied to the wider rout in emerging markets, as the local shares (017670.KS) are down only about 8% more than the KOSPI index as a whole (-15% versus -7%).

The company's lower ARPU has led me to revise my growth expectations lower, but today's share price is still about 20% below my fair value estimate. Unfortunately, I have real concerns about management's ability to effectively deploy capital. Rumors of a spin-off of non-strategic investments in POSCO and Hynix are encouraging but not new, and I think investors considering these shares need to at least contemplate the risk that the shares look undervalued for some good reasons.

Read more here:
SK Telecom May Be Cheap For Some Good Reasons

Seeking Alpha: MTN Group Desperately Needs To Get Its Act Together

Emerging market stocks have had a bad year in general, with most of the diversified indexes showing double-digit losses. South Africa's MTN Group (OTCPK:MTNOY) has done substantially worse, falling more than 50% this year and doubling the poor performance of the iShares MSCI South Africa Index (NYSEARCA:EZA), as the company has faced competitive challenges in many African markets, ongoing executive turmoil, and a huge regulatory fine in Nigeria.

That the shares seem significantly undervalued and represent a diversified play on the growth of Africa is really the only reason to continue to put up with the drama and volatility. MTN Group does do some things right, and the company is seeing strong performance from mobile data and mobile money, but the company desperately needs to name a strong candidate as CEO and craft a plan that will see the company compete profitably in its markets.

I believe that mid single-digit long-term revenue growth and high single-digit FCF growth can support a fair value close to $14 for the ADRs. That represents a substantial erosion of value over past articles on this company, but the movement of the rand against the dollar (from around 10.50 to 15.20) has done a lot of the damage. Cooperatively resolving the fine in Nigeria, leveraging growth potential in Nigeria, Iran, and Ghana, and competing intelligently in South Africa would all help drive value apart from macroeconomic factors like currency rates.

Read more here:
MTN Group Desperately Needs To Get Its Act Together

Seeking Alpha: Turkcell Looking Long Term, Market Thinking Short Term

As a reader commented on a prior Turkcell (NYSE:TKC) piece, Turkey's leading mobile operator sits at the intersection of two unpopular avenues today - mobile communications and Turkey. Investors have grown impatient with the growth prospects of mobile carriers as penetration rates grow, revenue and earnings growth slows, and the capex bills grow to keep with the evolution of technology. On the Turkey side, there are no shortage of problems and concerns ranging from so-so economic growth (4% GDP in the third quarter), a high-profile spat with Russia that cost a pilot his life, and ongoing military conflict involving Daesh in Syria and the PKK in Turkey.

Turkcell's ADRs have lost about 20% of their value since early May of this year, with further adverse moves in the Turkish lira magnifying a double-digit decline in the home TCELL.IS shares. For the little to no good it does to make investors feel a little better, Vodafone's (NASDAQ:VOD) ADRs have declined about 10% and Turk Telecom's (OTC:TRKNF) local shares have fallen more than 25% in Turkey.

I realize that fighting the tape is an invitation to short-term pain, but I think the market is too worried about the near term at Turkcell and not willing to consider the long-term opportunities. Turkcell continues to gather higher value post-paid subscribers and has been generating good growth from its mobile data, and the company's substantial investments in spectrum will have the company positioned for mobile data leadership for a decade. Turkcell's ADRs definitely need a more favorable outlook/sentiment for Turkey as a whole, but with a fair value close to $12, I think these shares are worth a look from patient investors today.

Please click here for more:
Turkcell Looking Long Term, Market Thinking Short Term

Seeking Alpha: Multi-Color Trading Short-Term Pain For Long-Term Gain

I've had my issues with the valuation of Multi-Color (NASDAQ:LABL) from time to time, but I can't really complain about the overall performance of this "under-known" label company, as the shares are up over 200% for me as an investor and up about 150% from my first article on the company for Seeking Alpha. While management still has work to do on gross margin improvement, the company has delivered operating margin improvements while using M&A to grow its revenue base and establish foothold in growth markets.

Although the label industry isn't really R&D-driven, Multi-Color doesn't really get its due for innovation in areas like in-mold and heat-transfer labels, nor value-added features like peel-aways, holographics, tamper resistance, and other technically demanding innovations. I also wonder if the Street appreciates that about half of the company's plants are still operating below management's long-term margin targets and could offer significant margin leverage in the coming years.

To be sure, I'm not saying that Multi-Color is a cheap stock. I might still be too conservative with my numbers, but I think 10% free cash flow margins are still at least five years away (on a sustainable basis). The shares do trade at an EV/EBITDA multiple below my expected EBITDA growth rate, but this is a stock that I'd be a lot more aggressive on below $60.

Read the full article here:
Multi-Color Trading Short-Term Pain For Long-Term Gain

Seeking Alpha: After Multiple Updates, Alnylam Hasn't Cleared Up Much

It's hard to say that Alnylam (NASDAQ:ALNY) has been badly treated by the market when it still sports a $7.5 billion market cap with no approved drugs (and no approvals likely until 2018). Leaving aside the impact of the debate about drug pricing and the overall turbulence of the biotech sector, there have been some Alynylam-specific issues weighing on investors' minds - including the efficacy and tolerability of revusiran and the efficacy of fitusiran and ALN-CC5.

The latter, in particular, seems to be a flashpoint with investors, as some bulls had hoped this would be a "Soliris-killer" and an heir to the substantial revenue that Alexion (NASDAQ:ALXN) has generated in complement-mediated diseases like paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobnuria (or PHN). Unfortunately, data presented at the ASH meeting and further discussed at the company's R&D day haven't really improved the sentiment.

As ALN-CC5 is not a big part of my valuation for Alnylam, I'm not bothered by the implications that it is not a clear winner in complemented-mediated diseases. Moreover, I think Alnylam has a potential winner in hemophilia and a deep overall pipeline of RNA interference drugs that will generate stock-moving clinical data in 2016.

Continue here for more:
After Multiple Updates, Alnylam Hasn't Cleared Up Much

Seeking Alpha: PRA Group Feeling A Tough Squeeze

Whatever the arguments about PRA Group's (NASDAQ:PRAA) underlying financial performance, there is really no argument that the stock market performance has been abysmal, with the shares down almost 40% since my last update on the company. PRA Group is trying to deal with multiple headwinds at once - the bankruptcy business has fallen off sharply, regulatory impediments are increasing, supply is tight, and the company is no longer in a part of the cycle that is as conducive to attractive collections numbers.

PRAA has navigated cyclical ups and downs before, and I believe the company will do so successfully once again. It's a high-risk call, though, as the company can do little to influence supply or the regulatory environment and the company's size makes outperformance more challenging. I believe the market is assuming a pretty sharp drop in the long-term profitability of the business that doesn't fully account for the potential of the non-U.S. business, nor the money to be made when large traditional sellers return to the market. Given the challenging accounting here and the generally reviled nature of the debt collection industry, I believe this is a story with high risk to offset the significant potential gains if 20% ROEs are still in play on a long-term basis.

Click here for more:
PRA Group Feeling A Tough Squeeze

Seeking Alpha: Maxwell's Road Still Bumpy, But Seems To Be Leading Somewhere

Maxwell (NASDAQ:MXWL) continues to be an exasperating story. On one hand, it's one of the only real ultracapacitor companies out there (let alone one of the only investable ones) and the company has scored wins with legitimate companies like Continental AG (OTCPK:CTTAY) and PACCAR (NASDAQ:PCAR). On the other hand, the company's excessive reliance on the heavily-subsidized Chinese bus and wind power markets has created a lot of volatility and left it exposed to intense price competition.

There is a very real chance that Maxwell could log three straight years of revenue contraction before seeing growth again in 2017, and that's hardly consistent with a traditional growth story. On the other hand, truck and passenger car manufacturers do seem to be increasingly interested in Maxwell's ultracapacitor technology and these two markets could drive meaningful future growth. A potentially sharp downturn in the Chinese bus opportunity over the next couple of years leads me to cut my fair value slightly and I'm not sure there's enough upside today to be worth the risk, but management's efforts to simultaneously sign up new OEM customers and improve margins could start paying off significantly in a couple of years.

Read the full article here:
Maxwell's Road Still Bumpy, But Seems To Be Leading Somewhere

Seeking Alpha: From Bad To Worse For MSC Industrial's Core Markets

I had my concerns about MSC Industrial (NYSE:MSM) back in the summer, as I was worried that ongoing weakness in U.S. manufacturing would make it harder for the company to achieve its margin leverage goals and grow revenue. That's proven to be the case, with monthly sales having turned negative and the shares losing another 22% or so in value from that last article.

I still believe that MSC Industrial is a good house in an increasingly sketchy neighborhood, and that's a tricky set-up for investors. Investors looking for more short-term punch (and/or who can't stand seeing near-term losses) should avoid these shares until there are real signs of strength in durable goods orders, ISM's purchasing managers' index, and other manufacturing metrics. More patient value-oriented investors may want to take a closer look, though, as there could be meaningful margin leverage and share gains pushing results (and the share price) higher over the long term.

Read more here:
From Bad To Worse For MSC Industrial's Core Markets

Seeking Alpha: Decision Time With Broadcom ... And Maybe With The Larger Sector

As the transaction with Avago (NASDAQ:AVGO) moves forward, Broadcom (NASDAQ:BRCM) investors have to make their decision on what to do with their shares. While shareholders may not ultimately get exactly what they want (the deal is subject to proration), they have the option to take cash, regular shares, or special restricted shares.

Investors are also looking at a changing semiconductor landscape. Barring any additional announcements before year-end, 2015 has already seen more than 25% of U.S. publicly-listed semiconductor stocks acquired or underway with being acquired. Given the rising cost of chip development, the low cost of debt and high cash balances at chip companies, and the opportunity to drive synergies, there may be more decisions like the Broadcom situation coming for investors.

Read more here:
Decision Time With Broadcom ... And Maybe With The Larger Sector

Personal update

I'm not sure how many people come here (and only here) for articles and updates vs. Seeking Alpha, so I thought I'd offer a quick update on my wife's condition. Between Facebook, Seeking Alpha, and personal emails, I'm not really able to remember where I've said what, so apologies if there repetitions here.

This past week my wife ended her second round of radiation and received another pembro infusion. The radiation was a five-day course intended to treat a metastatic tumor in her pelvis that has caused her muscle pain and some loss of mobility. While she hasn't experienced the severe pain you often hear about with bone mets, it was enough to cause her to need ibuprofen every day and eventually need a cane to walk. Interestingly, ibuprofen is a more effective pain reliever for bony mets than heavier painkillers (like oxy).

Anyways, we should know relatively soon whether the radiation helped. The oncologist was not optimistic that it would cure that tumor or be a 100% solution, but it should help.

On the chemo front, her bloodwork has stayed quite good, which is very positive. It doesn't prove that her liver tumors are quiet, but it does suggest they're not causing significant damage to the liver at this point. We'll know more in February when she gets her next CT/PET. For the time being, though, she's doing pretty well - the drug seems to be keeping the cancer in check and is not causing too many side-effects. The most curious side-effect is that it seems to intensify muscle aches/pains. It doesn't cause them, but if she has them around the time of the infusion, the drug seems to dial them up.

So, that's about it. She is feeling pretty well, and that's about the best we can expect for now.