There is an idea out there that the increasing  "democratization" of content and distribution will mean that the   age-old balance between artists and creative types and their corporate  masters has changed forevermore. If that is true, investors should  consider the possibility that there may never be another company quite  like Disney (NYSE:DIS) with its ability to create enduring global and iconic brands.
Has Distribution Changed the Game?
There  was a time that if someone wanted to be an actor, they had to accept  and work within the "studio system." Major studios like 
Fox Film, 
Warner Brothers and 
Paramount signed  up all of what they saw as the talented actors, directors and crew to  long-term exclusive deals, and they likewise controlled the production  studios, distribution networks, and in many cases the theater chains as  well. To be in movies outside of the major studios meant being in  low-budget "B movies" and perhaps never having people see your work.  (For related reading, see 
Why Movies Cost So Much To Make.)
Much the same was true for artists in other media. While there were  quite a lot of small publishing houses, authors who wanted to make a  living had to work through established publishers like 
Scribner's or magazine publishers like 
Amazing Stories and 
Weird Tales  - and these publishing outlets were increasingly acquired and  consolidated through the 60s, 70s, and 80s. When it came to media like  cartoons or comics, there was likewise a limited number of venues - if  you couldn't get a job with Warner Brothers, 
Hanna-Barbera, or 
Marvel, you were likely limited to self-publishing and had to hustle hard to get anyone to notice your work.
Read more at Investopedia:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/Can-There-Be-Another-Disney-DIS-AMZN-GOOG-TWX-NWS-CMCSK-HAS0907.aspx