Small, illiquid, and under-followed companies can be above-average alpha
generators, as they are often overlooked by analysts and institutional
investors or outright disqualified due to their low liquidity and so on.
It's not always the case, though, that these small gems are cheap. In
the case of Orchids Paper Products (TIS),
I believe this is an interesting paper products manufacturer with an
opportunity to further diversify its customer base and go up-market. I
also believe, though, that despite a lack of sell-side coverage and
institutional ownership, it's really not as cheap as I'd hoped it might
be.
Please follow this link to continue:
Orchids Paper Products Is Small And Solid, But Not So Cheap
Showing posts with label Kimberly-Clark. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kimberly-Clark. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
Seeking Alpha: Orchids Paper Products Is Small And Solid, But Not So Cheap
Thursday, April 25, 2013
Investopedia: Given Procter & Gamble's Performance, Should The Weak Volumes Matter More?
Investors seem to love gaudy expense-reduction programs, and Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG)
shares have certainly done better since Bill Ackman's Pershing Square
got involved and management announced a $10 billion cost-cutting
program. P&G's performance isn't so unusual in the wider context of a
hot market for consumer staple
stocks, but it's looking more and more like investors are overpaying
for the margin improvement potential and earnings consistency of these
names. Barring a quick turnaround in volumes, it looks like P&G
shares have overshot the mark and offer less compelling potential from
today's level.
Follow the link below to continue:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/042513/given-procter-gambles-performance-should-weak-volumes-matter-more-pg-cl-chd-enr-un-kmb-ul.aspx
Follow the link below to continue:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/042513/given-procter-gambles-performance-should-weak-volumes-matter-more-pg-cl-chd-enr-un-kmb-ul.aspx
Monday, April 22, 2013
Investopedia: Kimberly-Clark Looks Way Too Expensive For What It Is
Investors can certainly make good money investing in well-run personal
care companies with solid brands. Along those lines, names like Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG), Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE:CL), Unilever (NYSE:UN), and Kimberly-Clark (NYSE:KMB)
have all delivered very strong capital gains over the past year. In the
case of Kimberly-Clark in particular, though, I do worry that this
consumer staples melt-up has gone a little too far. I do like the
company's growth potential in emerging markets, but commodity inflation
could threaten further margin improvements and I believe the stock is
too expensive relative to its growth prospects.
Please continue here:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/042213/kimberlyclark-looks-way-too-expensive-what-it-kmb-pg-un-cl-jnj.aspx
Please continue here:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/042213/kimberlyclark-looks-way-too-expensive-what-it-kmb-pg-un-cl-jnj.aspx
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)