Showing posts with label Metabolix. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Metabolix. Show all posts

Friday, May 4, 2012

Investopedia: ADM Working Through A Lull

One quarter ago, I opined that Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) looked like a good stock for patient investors. With the stock having doubled the return of the S&P 500 over that brief time period, so far so good. ADM's business is always going to be a volatile, commodity-driven enterprise, but the company does earn long-term economic returns on an asset base that would be extremely difficult (and expensive) to replicate.

Click the link for more:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2012/ADM-Working-Through-A-Lull-ADM-BG-CPO-DD0504.aspx

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Investopedia: No Quick Fixes At ADM, But The Value Is There

A quarter ago I was pretty positive on the shares of Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM). This was not so much because I saw a dramatic turnaround coming in the business, but because I saw it as a good long-term value. Although fiscal second quarter earnings show that there are still some very real challenges, investors really haven't hurt themselves by owning these shares as a long-term value.

Another Difficult (and Complicated) Quarter  
All in all, the fiscal second quarter was not very good for ADM. Reported revenue did rise 11% and the company posted gaudy-looking growth in oilseeds processing (up 28%) and corn processing (up 29%), while the huge ag services business saw a 1% sales decline.

To read more, follow the link below:
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2012/No-Quick-Fixes-At-ADM-But-The-Value-Is-There-ADM-BG-CPO-MBLX0201.aspx

Thursday, May 13, 2010

A Few Fruits From This Week's Research

When you're a stock junkie (to say nothing of a financial writer), you're pretty much always doing stock research. Sometimes you go a while before finding good ideas, and then sometimes you find them in bunches.

This week turned up a few interesting tidbits, as I was looking mostly at the chemicals sector.

Goodyear (GT) - Analysts seem to like this one, and it was up more than 10% in the past week. But a tire company? Really? Sure, the EV/EBITDA ratio isn't bad, but this company's historical ability to produce real returns (ROIC) isn't very good.

Aceto (ACET) - I like the idea of a company that makes the chemical underpinnings of pharmaceuticals, particularly generics. By and large, these guys don't mess with the legal patent wrangling like a TEVA. The EV/EBITDA is on the high side, but this one looks interesting.

Calgon Carbon (CCC) - Wow. Great business and decent returns on capital, but a pretty poor long-term record of growth and doesn't look at all cheap to me (though the analysts seem to like it well enough).

Hexcel (HXL) - Nice story (carbon fiber for Boeing and Airbus), but I can't even get close to making this one work on a valuation basis.

Lubrizol (LZ) - Am I the only one who didn't know this company was producing double-digit ROICs, good growth, and a strong free cash flow yield? Unfortunately, as much as the company looks like a winner, the stock seems to be there already.

Metabolix (MBLX) - You either win big or lose big. It's a nice idea, making plastics out of corn, switchgrass, and the like, but valuation is an exercise in faith. Treat it like a biotech. I probably should go back and double-check the IP here, because that will be the real deciding factor.

Methanex (MEOH) - I was shocked at how cheap this one looks when I value it by a forward EBITDA basis. It's been a volatile commodity business in the past, but they have a lot of unused capacity (good for margins if volumes go up) and China seems poised to use a lot more methanol.

Sigma Aldrich (SIAL) - Great company. No bargain in the stock, though.

Huntsman (HUN) - Hmmm. This one could be interesting. It's a diversified chemicals business, but a little less commoditized than your average commodity business. This one could be worth a closer look.

Landec
(LNDC) - This was a popular "little known" growth stock a few years ago. It was supposed to be a company that "looked like a commodity business, but really wasn't". Guess what? It was. At least enough to knock the wind out of its sales. I'm intrigued, though, and if my numbers are right this could be a cheap one.

And so ends the gleanings from this week's research. There were a lot more names I looked at, but I feel like 10 at a time is about all anybody wants to read about.

Happy hunting!