I can understand why at least some investors would prefer the certain accretion of buybacks over another M&A transaction that brings integration and execution risk. I believe further transformation is necessary, though, and I favor using cash flow to build up (or perhaps shore up) the company’s future prospects and cash flow generation capabilities, so I see this as a short-term versus long-term debate. I do think the selloff makes the shares more interesting, but I do also see ongoing execution risk here.
Click the link for the full article:
NRG Energy And Vivint: Paying For Transformation, The Street Prefers Buybacks
No comments:
Post a Comment