It looks like an outbreak of rationality has hit BlackBerry (Nasdaq:BBRY),
as the company announced on Monday that it had formed a special
committee to “explore strategic alternatives” for the struggling handset
company. While the company's announcement mentioned options like joint
ventures, partnerships, and alliances, shareholders, analysts, and
investors are are zeroing in almost exclusively on the possibility of a
sale.
If BlackBerry is serious about a sale, it'll happen. I have no doubt
that, at the right price, the company can find a buyer willing to take
on the not-inconsiderable task of turning around this struggling
high-end handset company. The trick is going to be that “at the right
price” part. BlackBerry's enterprise value (that is, market
capitalization net of cash and debt on the balance sheet) isn't very
large, but any buyer is looking at a likely multi-year
restructuring/turnaround program that will require capital, compress
margins, and offer only uncertain payoffs.
Please click the link to read more:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/081413/blackberry-finally-looking-bidder-will-real-buyer-bite-bbry-amzn-msft-goog.aspx
Showing posts with label Blackberry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blackberry. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Wednesday, July 24, 2013
Investopedia: What's The Glide Path For Apple's Margins?
Wall Street is a quarter-to-quarter world, and that means analysts are always going to obsess over the unit and ASP numbers for Apple's (Nasdaq:AAPL)
iPhone and iPad. What I think is more important to consider, though, is
the future path of Apple's margins. The inexorable reality for consumer
electronics companies is lower ASPs and lower margins, and lower
margins are never good for stocks. Even conservative free cash flow
growth assumptions suggest Apple shares are much too cheap now, but the
realities of holding shares in a company facing persistent margin
erosion may mean that it's a long path to reaping that value.
Please continue reading here:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/072413/whats-glide-path-apples-margins-aapl-bbry-chl-pay.aspx
Please continue reading here:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/072413/whats-glide-path-apples-margins-aapl-bbry-chl-pay.aspx
Labels:
Apple,
Blackberry,
China Mobile,
Gemalto,
HTC,
Ingenico,
Investopedia,
Samsung,
VeriFone
Friday, June 28, 2013
Investopedia: BlackBerry Still Doesn't Get It
There's maybe no better example of the disconnect between the real world and the stock market than the near-tripling of BlackBerry's (Nasdaq:BBRY)
stock price from the September lows of 2012 to the February highs of
this year. This is a company that still doesn't appear to know how to
handle investor relations, nor actually listen to what customers want
and design their devices accordingly. The company's sizable cash balance
gives management many additional bites at the cherry, but it's hard for
me to see a reason to believe they'll execute on the turnaround
opportunities in front of them.
Please read more here:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/062813/blackberry-still-doesnt-get-it-bbry-aapl-nok-lnvgy.aspx
Please read more here:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/062813/blackberry-still-doesnt-get-it-bbry-aapl-nok-lnvgy.aspx
Labels:
Apple,
Blackberry,
HTC,
Investopedia,
Lenovo,
Nokia,
Samsung
Monday, May 27, 2013
Investopedia: Marvell Unloved, But Does That Mean Undervalued?
It's hardly news to say that Wall Street plays favorites and in doing so
sometimes goes well past the bounds of reality with respect to a
company's real underlying value. For every ARM Holdings (Nasdaq:ARMH) or Analog Devices (NYSE:ADI), there seems to be at least one undervalued company. The question for shareholders is whether Marvell (Nasdaq:MRVL)
deserves to be included in that latter group. While the valuation seems
quite undemanding, this company still has a ways to go to convince
investors that it still has the competitiveness and the business model
to drive better long-term results.
Please read more here:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/052413/marvell-unloved-does-mean-undervalued-mrvl-lsi-qcom-stx-bbry.aspx
Please read more here:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/052413/marvell-unloved-does-mean-undervalued-mrvl-lsi-qcom-stx-bbry.aspx
Labels:
Blackberry,
Investopedia,
LSI,
Marvell,
Qualcomm,
Seagate
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Investopedia: The Defenestration Of Apple Continues
As I suggested back in January on this website, I thought Apple (Nasdaq:AAPL)
could have further to fall as growth investors and fan-boys dove off
the bandwagon in the wake of less-than-perfect execution. In that short
space of time, the shares dropped about 20%, leading to a huge loss of
shareholder wealth (at least on paper).
Apple is a curious stock to me now. I do believe that the stock is too cheap relative to what I see as the probable trajectory of revenue and cash flow. By the same token, I've been at this too long to underestimate the headwinds that a stock can face when a large base of shareholders becomes disenchanted with a story and moves on for greener pastures. I do believe that patient investors will do better than just okay in Apple shares from these levels, but investors buying in today have to accept at least the risk of a further over-correction on the downside before the shares start to perform again.
Please continue below:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/042413/defenestration-apple-continues-aapl-nok-goog-amzn-bbry.aspx
Apple is a curious stock to me now. I do believe that the stock is too cheap relative to what I see as the probable trajectory of revenue and cash flow. By the same token, I've been at this too long to underestimate the headwinds that a stock can face when a large base of shareholders becomes disenchanted with a story and moves on for greener pastures. I do believe that patient investors will do better than just okay in Apple shares from these levels, but investors buying in today have to accept at least the risk of a further over-correction on the downside before the shares start to perform again.
Please continue below:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/042413/defenestration-apple-continues-aapl-nok-goog-amzn-bbry.aspx
Labels:
Amazon,
Apple,
Blackberry,
Google,
Investopedia,
Nokia,
Samsung
Thursday, April 4, 2013
Investopedia: Samsung Stores A No-Risk Opportunity For Best Buy
Give credit to Best Buy (NYSE:BBY)
– the company is not going down without a fight. While there are still
ample concerns about whether there's life in big-box electronics and
appliance retailing, Best Buy is trying to find ways to rejuvenate the
stores. Even in the absence of a buyout led by founder Richard Schulze, the stock has rallied back to a 52-week high on optimism about these moves.
The latest move is an interesting one for the company – the launch of a “store within a store” concept with Samsung, the other 800-lb gorilla of the smartphone and tablet market. Although these mini-stores are unlikely to significantly improve overall sales for Best Buy, they could be good for margins and could point to a new direction in big-box retailing.
Please click here to continue:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/040413/samsung-stores-no-risk-opportunity-best-buy-bby-aapl-nok-bbry.aspx
The latest move is an interesting one for the company – the launch of a “store within a store” concept with Samsung, the other 800-lb gorilla of the smartphone and tablet market. Although these mini-stores are unlikely to significantly improve overall sales for Best Buy, they could be good for margins and could point to a new direction in big-box retailing.
Please click here to continue:
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/040413/samsung-stores-no-risk-opportunity-best-buy-bby-aapl-nok-bbry.aspx
Labels:
Apple,
Best Buy,
Blackberry,
Investopedia,
Nokia,
Samsung
Monday, December 20, 2010
Is RIMM Losing The War?
Research In Motion (Nasdaq:RIMM) would not be the first company to largely invent a market, only to see latecomers take the business away from them. Although it is absolutely fair to debate whether RIMM's Blackberry "invented" the market that Apple (Nasdaq:AAPL), Google (Nasdaq:GOOG) and Motorola (NYSE:MOT) are profitably exploiting now, the more relevant question is whether RIMM can withstand the battles in the market and remain a top competitor. After all, Nokia (NYSE:NOK) was seen as a leader once, too.
A Bright Quarter With A Dark Shadow
In many respects RIMM delivered a fine quarter. Revenue rose 40% from last year (and 19% sequentially) to almost $5.5 billion, with handset revenue and shipments increasing by similar degrees. Given that RIMM surpassed the average estimate and was close to the high end of the range, that would normally be good news. On the other hand, U.S. revenue dropped 16% sequentially despite an aggressive promotion of Torch at AT&T (NYSE:T) and channel inventory ticked up - while either of these events on their own may be no problem, the combination is a valid reason for concern.
Nevertheless, profitability at RIMM is still good. Gross margin improved almost a full point from last year (though declined more than that sequentially), and operating margin was modestly better. All in all, operating income rose 42% from last year (and 16% from last quarter), while net profits rose 45%. RIMM also did well from a cash perspective, adding about $450 million in cash to the balance sheet.
The link below leads to the full article:
http://stocks.investopedia. com/stock-analysis/2010/Is- RIMM-Losing-The-War-RIMM-AAPL- GOOG-NOK-MOT-VZ-MRVL1220.aspx
A Bright Quarter With A Dark Shadow
In many respects RIMM delivered a fine quarter. Revenue rose 40% from last year (and 19% sequentially) to almost $5.5 billion, with handset revenue and shipments increasing by similar degrees. Given that RIMM surpassed the average estimate and was close to the high end of the range, that would normally be good news. On the other hand, U.S. revenue dropped 16% sequentially despite an aggressive promotion of Torch at AT&T (NYSE:T) and channel inventory ticked up - while either of these events on their own may be no problem, the combination is a valid reason for concern.
Nevertheless, profitability at RIMM is still good. Gross margin improved almost a full point from last year (though declined more than that sequentially), and operating margin was modestly better. All in all, operating income rose 42% from last year (and 16% from last quarter), while net profits rose 45%. RIMM also did well from a cash perspective, adding about $450 million in cash to the balance sheet.
The link below leads to the full article:
http://stocks.investopedia.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)