At what point to a company's misses say more about the
characteristics of an industry and those analysts who cover it rather
than the company itself? I ask that question at the beginning, as it
seems to really apply to PBF Energy (PBF).
PBF has a lot of things that ought to work in its favor, including good
exposure to differentials in Bakken and Western Canadian crude,
relatively complex refineries in the East, and value-adding rail
logistics assets. Yet, PBF Energy has been scolded repeatedly by
analysts for missing their estimates, with each of the company's three
reported quarters to date for 2013 coming in below expectations.
I
think the reality is that the refinery industry is a difficult one to
forecast, particularly given the volatility in the differentials that
underpin so much of the investment thesis for PBF Energy. I do believe
that that company's ability to take crude from Western Canada and the
Bakken and transport it to its East Coast refineries at very competitive
costs is an advantage, and I'm skeptical that pipelines are a
high-probability near-term threat to the crude-by-rail thesis. On
balance, I think PBF is undervalued today, but readers considering these
shares have to realize how the volatility of differentials, logistics
capacity on the supply side, renewable fuel policies, and basic economic
conditions feed into the above-average volatility of these shares.
Please follow this link to continue:
Good Or Bad, PBF Energy Won't Be Boring
No comments:
Post a Comment